Below is the list of the 25 most dominant March Madness runs and eight dynasties in tournament history as I play my latest All-Time Sweet 16 in the Value Add Basketball Game simulation. I list the numerical breakdown of the best 25 March Madness showings in history, but first will explain my reasoning and outline why I rank the greatest NCAA dynasties as follows:
UCLA (1967–1973)
UConn (2023–2024)
San Francisco (1955–1956, led by Bill Russell)
Florida (2006–2007)
Cincinnati (early 1960s)
Duke (1991–1992)
Villanova (2016–2018)
Kentucky (1948–1949)
Analysis of Dominance
UConn's Regular Season and Tournament Dominance
UConn’s 2023 season included some losses in Big East play and a defeat in the conference tournament championship against Marquette. However, for elite teams assured of a tournament berth, the regular season no longer holds the same weight as it did decades ago. Back then, a team needed to win its conference to qualify for the tournament. Today, regular-season games serve as opportunities to rest and prepare for March Madness, which is where true dominance is proven. The 2023 and 2024 UConn teams produced two of the top five tournament performances in history, solidifying their place as the greatest dynasty besides UCLA.The Importance of Multiple Titles
Winning multiple championships is essential to validate claims of all-time greatness. For example, if the Cincinnati Reds had lost Game 7 to the Boston Red Sox, their subsequent title wouldn’t place them among baseball’s greatest teams. Similarly, UNLV’s 30-point title game win in 1990 would have sparked greater consideration had they secured a second championship. UConn’s 2023 and 2024 teams achieved this standard by not only dominating every non-conference opponent in 2023 but also following up with another title and a top-five all-time tournament performance in 2024.
Other All-Time Great March Madness Teams in Chronological Order
Kentucky (1948–1949 - meaning 2 seasons that ENDED in 48 and 49)
While Kentucky’s dominance in the 8-team tournaments of the 1940s is impressive, those tournaments did not feature the depth or quality of competition seen in later years.San Francisco (1955–1956)
Led by Bill Russell, San Francisco’s teams achieved top-25 all-time March Madness runs. Russell’s unmatched ability to win titles, both in college and the NBA, cements his status as the greatest winner in basketball history.Cincinnati (1960–1962)
Oscar Robertson’s brilliance in 1960 laid the foundation for Cincinnati’s dominance, with March Madness runs in 1961 and 1962 ranking 23rd and 10th on the all-time list.Duke (1991–1992)
Duke’s back-to-back titles in 1991 and 1992 included tournament runs that rank 20th and 24th in dominance.Florida (2006–2007)
Despite a regular season similar to UConn 2023, Florida’s dominance in the 2006 and 2007 tournaments ranks 9th and 19th, proving their focus on peak performance in March.Villanova (2016–2018)
Villanova’s dynasty includes the 13th most dominant March Madness run in 2018, just two years after their initial title, securing their place among the all-time greats.
Two closest misses are UNLV, if they could have just pulled off one more title, and then North Carolina who has just spread their titles over time but never within a few years of each other, though they have appeared in the title game in consecutive years twice but both times lost and then won. You could also break the UCLA dynasty into Kareem, Bill Walton and the years in between to get two or three.
The following are the 25 greatest March Madness tournaments based on the percent of points more scored than allowed. UConn's 2024 is the greatest ever with the 81.0 points scored a total of 140.5% of the 57.7 they allowed per tournament game.
| Rnk | Most Dominant | Year | PPG/ tourney | Allow/ tourney | % scored | Best Value Add Player Card in Game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connecticut | 2024 | 81.0 | 57.7 | 140.5% | not in Game, 2023 Adama Sanogo instead |
| 2 | Indiana | 1981 | 78.8 | 56.2 | 140.2% | Isiah Thomas #26 |
| 3 | UCLA | 1967 | 85.3 | 61.5 | 138.6% | Kareem Abdul-Jabbar #3 |
| 4 | UCLA | 1968 | 81.0 | 59.8 | 135.6% | not in game, 1967 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar instead |
| 5 | Connecticut | 2023 | 79.2 | 59.2 | 133.8% | Adama Sanogo |
| 6 | Kentucky | 1996 | 89.2 | 67.7 | 131.8% | Antoine Walker |
| 7 | Ohio State | 1960 | 83.8 | 64.3 | 130.4% | Jerry Lucas #72, John Havlicek #29 |
| 8 | North Carolina | 2009 | 87.8 | 67.7 | 129.8% | not in game, 2005 Sean May instead |
| 9 | Florida | 2006 | 72.7 | 56.7 | 128.2% | Joakim Noah |
| 10 | Cincinnati | 1962 | 70.5 | 55.3 | 127.6% | not in Game, 1960 Oscar Robertson team instead |
| 11 | Michigan State | 2000 | 71.7 | 56.3 | 127.2% | Mateen Cleaves |
| 12 | UCLA | 1972 | 85.0 | 67.0 | 126.9% | Bill Walton #64 |
| 13 | Villanova | 2018 | 83.8 | 66.2 | 126.7% | Mikal Bridges |
| 14 | UCLA | 1973 | 77.3 | 61.3 | 126.1% | not in game, 1972 Bill Walton instead |
| 15 | UNLV | 1990 | 95.2 | 76.5 | 124.4% | not in game, 1991 Larry Johnson instead |
| 16 | Duke | 2001 | 86.8 | 70.2 | 123.8% | Shane Battier |
| 17 | San Francisco | 1955 | 72.6 | 58.8 | 123.5% | not in game, 1956 Bill Russell instead |
| 18 | Indiana | 1976 | 76.0 | 62.8 | 121.0% | Scott May |
| 19 | Florida | 2007 | 82.7 | 68.5 | 120.7% | not in Game, 2006 Joakim Noah instead |
| 20 | Duke | 1991 | 82.8 | 68.8 | 120.3% | Not in game, 1992 Christian Laettner team instead |
| 21 | San Francisco | 1956 | 83.3 | 69.3 | 120.2% | Bill Russell #4 |
| 22 | NC State | 1974 | 87.0 | 72.8 | 119.6% | David Thompson |
| 23 | Cincinnati | 1961 | 74.8 | 62.8 | 119.1% | not in Game, 1960 Oscar Robertson team instead |
| 24 | Duke | 1992 | 82.3 | 69.8 | 117.9% | Christian Laettner |
| 25 | Kentucky | 2012 | 81.3 | 69.5 | 117.0% | Anthony Davis #53 |
No comments:
Post a Comment