Thursday, May 31, 2018

LeBron now GOAT; Midnight Announcement Leaves Nevada No. 1

What a 24 hours for basketball! But before we run through why LeBron James (who will always be tied to our Dwyane Wade) takes the court tonight at Golden State having passed Michael Jordan as the most valuable player of all time, let's talk about what happened just before the midnight deadline for players to return to their colleges rather than stay eligible for the NBA draft in three weeks ...

At 11:33 p.m. ET last night, Cody Martin tweeted that he would return to Nevada, and at 11:34 his twin Caleb Martin confirmed he would stay as well - beating the Midnight deadline for players to leave the NBA draft t return to school. Kentucky, Villanova, Tennessee, Maryland and Virginia Tech were not so lucky, losing players to drop in the www.valueaddbasketball.com top 25.
  
However, Kentucky's replacement players were so good that they actually remained the No. 3 team in the nation. Duke passed them for No. 2, but Villanova fell from No. 2 to No. 10 - with Kansas rounding out the projected Final Four. Here is the top 25 with notes on teams that lost players to the NBA once and for all at Midnight.
  
Team   Top 8 Value Add
1.   Nevada   52.98 – Cody and Caleb Martin announced return at 11:33 pm to keep them at No. 1 with 52.98 combined Value Add.
2.   Duke   46.65
3.   Kentucky   stayed in third despite 241st Vanderbilt (5.17) & 272nd Gabriel (4.93) dropping but being replaced by almost as good 9th and 10th men (8.22 combined Value Add) as Villanova dropped further and Duke moved ahead of Kentucky’s 45.33
4.   Kansas   42.26
5.   Oregon   41.52
6.   North Carolina   40.31
7.   Mississippi St.   40.05
8.   Louisiana St.   39.18
9.   Auburn   38.66
10.   Villanova   dropped from 2nd after 25th ranked Spellman (8.01 Value Add) & 32nd DiVincenzo, (7.84) both left and replacements are a combined 6.85 to lower team from 47.51 to 38.51
11.   Gonzaga   37.94
12.   Tennessee   dropped from 6th after Alexander, 5.89 left and with (1.25 replacement) lowered from 42.01 to 37.37
13.   Syracuse   37.44
14.   North Carolina St.   35.07
15.   Indiana   34.95
16.   Virginia   34.62
17.   Texas   34.28
18.   UCLA   34.26
19.   Kansas St.   34.16
20.   Michigan St.   33.63
21.   Marquette   33.13
22.   Maryland   39.36 – dropped from 9th after 33rd ranked Huerter (7.82) left and only a 1.23 replacement to lower from 39.36 to 32.77
23.   Florida   32.73
24.   Iowa   32.49
25.   Arizona St.   32.1 (moved from 26th to 25th due to Virginia Tech dropping out)
Dropped Out - Virginia Tech   33.49 – dropped from 21st to 33rd after 381th ranked Alexander-Walker (4.25 Value Add) left with only 1.32 replacement Value Add to drop from 33.49 to 30.85
  
... now back to the inconvenient truth that LeBron James takes the court tonight as the GOAT, at least if that means the most valuable player in the history of basketball. Now that all of my friends in North Carolina and Chicago have stopped reading, let's walk through this.
  
As Golden State opens as a double digit favorite in the opener of the NBA Finals, Michael Jordan fans are likely to still be able to cling to their one argument for his superiority over LeBron James - six championships.
  
This ignores the fact that Jordan was one of THREE Hall of Famers playing at HOF levels (one of those years all three were in the top 15 in MVP voting) were on the 4th, 5th and 6th championship, and that argument leaves Jordan behind Robert Horry (7 titles), a legitimate contender for the greatest of all-time in Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and many previous players who had more than six.
  
In this his 15th season, LeBron James was more than twice as valuable as Jordan was in his 15th and final season based on career Win Shares (the only way to truly compare players from different eras).
  
In fact, in his five seasons without Hall of Famer Scottie Pippen on the court with him, Jordan never even had a winning season, averaging just 30 wins and 52 losses. Jordan apologists complained when James went to Miami to likewise team up with a future Hall of Fame Player in Marquette's Dwyane Wade - but James did not need a Hall of Fame teammate to make his teams awesome - averaging a 51-31 record in the years before and after he and Wade teamed up.
  
So when they had to carry their teams without the help of another Hall of Fame player, James’ teams were 21 wins better than Jordan's teams.
  
It is also fair to note that while Pippen finished 5th, 7th and 9th in MVP voting three of his years with Jordan, and in one year Dennis Rodman gave Jordan TWO teammates in the top 15 in voting - only one season has LeBron ever had a top 9 teammate (Wade 7th, as his best player was prior to James' arrival). In short, Jordan never produced nearly the same results as Jordan EXCEPT when he had Hall of Fame support far superior to the poor cast James dragged to the NBA Finals some of his years.
  
The three years before Jordan arrived in Chicago, the Bulls averaged a 36-46 record. Jordan played three seasons before another Hall of Fame player arrived, and during his three years befoer adding Pippen Jordan's teams averaged the identical 36-46 record. Jordan scored a lot - but his team was no better with him until another Hall of Famer came along.
  
Compare this to the transformation of the Cavs after James’ arrival. The Cavs prior to James were far worse than the Bulls prior to Jordan, with a 17-65 record. For an apples to apples, they averaged 25-67 in the 3 years prior to James arrival (11 games worse than the pre-Jordan Bulls), yet in their first three years with James the averaged 42-40 for a 17 average improvement in wins to ZERO for Jordan.
  
Jordan did not lead his team to a winning record until he was 25 and Pippen had arrived - but by age 25 James finished his seventh season having taken his Cavs to an average mark of 50-32 before leaving to Miami to team up with a player almost at Pippen’s level in Wade.
  
The difference continued throughout their careers. In the years before or after James and Jordan left and arrived, James’ teams averaged being 22 games better with him than without him and Jordan's teams did not improve at all until an extra Hall of Famer was added to the roster.
  
The dreadful Cavs improved 18 games as soon as the teenager James took the court. When he went from the Cavs to the Heat the Cavs lost 42 more games and the Heat won 11 more games. When he went back to the Cavs they won 20 more games and the Heat lost 17 more, for an average of 22 more wins a season with than without James.


Season
LeBron arriving or departing
W
L
Before and After
2003-04
Cleveland Cavaliers
35
47
18
2009-10
Cleveland Cavaliers
61
21
42
2010-11
Miami Heat
58
24
11
2013-14
Miami Heat
54
28
17
2014-15
Cleveland Cavaliers
53
29
20
Teams 22 games better w/LeBron
22


Contrast this with the amazing lack of difference Jordan’s departures and returns made. When he arrived from UNC he made the Bulls one game worse at 27-55, and as noted did not improve them one game over his first three years. When he took the 1993-94 season off the Bulls were only two games worse. 

James critics will note that Jordan then came back for only part of the 1994-95 season, but he was there for the entire playoffs and the team did just as well as they did the year before without him - a loss in the Conference Semifinals. The next year they had a monster year - but remember that was only after adding a THIRD Hall of Fame Player in Dennis Rodman to the them.
  
And then Jordan played his final two seasons with the Wizards’ - his 14th and 15th seasons, but unlike James’ 14th and 15th seasons he was simply not very good, getting a couple of MVP mentions the first year and then having a nice farewell tour. The Wizards’ were 10 games worse when he arrived, and just as good the year after he left.
  

That means the only time a team was more than two games better the year after or before Jordan left was after the 1997-98 season - WHEN ALL THREE HALL OF FAME PLAYERS LEFT AT ONCE.

Season
Jordan arriving or departing
W
L
Before and After
1983-84
Chicago Bulls
27
55
-1
1992-93
Chicago Bulls
57
25
2
1994-95
Chicago Bulls
47
35
-8
1997-98
Chicago Bulls***
62
20
41
2000-01
Washington Wizards
19
63
-10
2001-02
Washington Wizards
37
45
0
Teams 4 games better w/Jordan
4

*** because of the 1998-99 strike, the Bulls record is projected with 21 wins

Jordan was an incredible leader of teams with other Hall of Fame players, and he knew how to close when his teammates were superior to all the opponents they would face. I will even grant that his three best seasons may have been slightly better than any of James' seasons.
  
However, James’ ability to take teams that should not be in the playoffs all the way to the NBA Finals time and time again is a much dramatic than Jordan’s ability to make sure his Hall of Fame teammates did not blow championships.
  
James passed Jordan and he is still playing strong.
  
Unless you want to argue that Horry is greater than Jordan because of the extra championship, it is time to admit there is a new all time King.


Monday, May 28, 2018

Free Statis-Pro Baseball Game Made Simple

Quick Start Page (to learn to play in 5 minutes click here)
Entire Statis-Pro game can be played with only this top page, dice and player cards

A. Traditional 6-sided dice for the PB rating of 2 to 12.
B. Two 8-sided dice of different colors to create a Random Number of 11 to 88.
C. If you have 20-sided die then use chart below for all "Out" results, but if anyone
is on base and the roll is "20" then ignore A and B above & instead go to yellow below.
When Pitchers bat, skip the PB and draw the random number with the following results: 1b7: 11-12, 1b8: 13-14,
1b9: 15-16, 2b8: 17, K: 18-52, W: 53-54, Out: 55-88. OBR: E, SP: E, Sac: CC
Once a runner is on base, you can use one of these three options before the next batter hits,
but an OBR E may not try for an extra base, and SP E may not try to steal.


1 die
Extra Base on hit
Stealing base
Bunting
1
OBR A, B or C Xtra base        
SP AA, A, B or C steals     
Sacrifice, OBR: A batter safe for hit
2
OBR A or B Xtra base
SP AA, A or B steals
Sacrifice
3
OBR A Xtra base
SP AA or A steals
Sacrifice
4
Xtra base only if 2 outs
Only SP AA steals
Sacrifice
5
Hold base
Hold, TA throws out
Strikeout
6
Roll again for throw
TA, TB out, TC roll again,1-3 out, otherwise steals
Leader Runner out

When trying to take an extra base on the chart above, the runner can only be out on a roll of 6. On rolls of 1-5 he just fails to take the extra base if his OBR or SP is not good enough.
However, if a 6 is rolled, then there is a close play and he will be either safe or out.
The 6-sided die is rolled one more time, and this time if the number is equal to or less than
the outfielders throwing arm (T5, T4, T3 or T2) then he is out. SP E or OBR E cannot try to steal or take extra base, respectively.

20-Sided Die result (always use if "Out," and if roll is number 20 then always use)
1. Double play 6-4-3 (any Double play when no one on 1st, the batter is thrown out)
2. Double Play 4-6-3* OBR A batter beats throw to 1st
3. Double Play 5-4-3, OBR A or B batter beats throw to 1st
4.      Double Play 3-4-3*, OBR A, B or C batter beats throw to 1st
5.      Double Play, OBR A, B or C batter beats throw to 1st (Odd PB 1-6-3, even PB 2-6-3)
If no one on 1st base on a double play above, the throw is to 1st base for out. With 1st and 3rd base,
defense can say INFIELD IN before roll, and instead of double play batter out and runners now 2nd
and 3rd base.**If only man on base is on 2nd, he advances if ball hit to 1b or 2b ("2," 4," or "8")
6.      Lead forced (home, 2b or 1b runner out), others advance (third base to lead base)
7.      Lead forced (home, 2b or 1b runner out), others advance (shortstop to lead base)
8.      Lead forced* (home, 2b or 1b runner out), others advance (2nd base to lead base)
9.    Line out (to higher number 1-6 of two die roll - 1=p, 2=c, 3=1b, 4=2b, 5=3b, 6=ss)
10.  Infield fly (position determined like in "9", for catcher change to popup)
11.   Fly out to left field, runners hold (LN or LP is fly out to right field)
12.   Fly out to left field, runners hold
13.   Fly out to center field, OBR A on 2nd or 3rd advance
14.   Fly out to center field, runner OBR A or B on 2nd or 3rd advance
15.   Fly out to right field, runner on 2nd or 3rd advance
16.   Batter grounds out, runners advance (1b to P covering)
17.   Batter grounds out, runners advance (C if PB even number, or P if PB odd to 1st base)
18 or 19.   ROLL two 6-sided dice AGAIN and refer to green to see which fielder might
make 1-base error. If the 20-sided die roll is equal to or lower than the E number by the fielder,
then a one-base error is made. On rolls from 11-20, subtract 10, and if the resultant number is
equal to or lower than the E rating on the fielder, then a 2-base error is made. Otherwise,
the play is an out to that player and the runners advance.

2 diceCheck for error      2 diceCheck for error
2 or 31b      82B
4P      9LF
5CF     10C
63b     11RF
7SS     12SS
(e.g. Aaron Judge is E2, so roll of 3 or 13 NOT error)
20. If noone on base then a "20" on an out is a flyout to CF.
If anyone is on base when a 20 is rolled, then ignore the normal PB and RN on the batter or pitcher card, INSTEAD use those dice for the numbers below for what might be a BD (Clutch Batting),
CD (Clutch Fielding) or Z (Unusual Plays):


2 - BD - Clutch Batting: Look up the Random Number of 11-88 on batters card for bases-clearing double, triple or home run or if not in range then ignore as a foul.
3 - BD - Clutch Batting (same as "2")
4 - BD - Clutch Batting (same as "2")

Numbers 5 through 9 use the two 6-sided dice to pick a position below, and the 11 to 88 on the chart (e.g. if the two die were a one and a six to total 7, then refer to the Clutch Defense of the 1st baseman "7 (1&6) - 1b")
5 - CF 
6 (1 & 5) - LF
6 (2 & 4) - RF
6 (3 & 3) - P
7 (1 & 6) - 1B
7 (2 & 5) - 2B
7 (3 & 4) - 3B
8 (4 & 4) - C
8 (2 & 6 or 3 & 5) - SS
9 - CF

CD1 = no play madeCD Clutch DefenseChance for Great Play
Infielders resultCD2                   CD3CD4
Line out, lead runner doubled  11 to 21           11 to 4211 to 56
Grounder, lead runner thrown out22 to 32           43 to 5557 to 78
No action, return to normal play33 to 88           56 to 8881 to 88
Outfielders only


CD2           CD3CD4
Line out in gap, lead runner doubled off base11 to 21           11 to 4211 to 56
Line out, runners get back safely22 to 32           43 to 5557 to 78
No action, return to normal play33 to 88           56 to 8881 to 88
Catchers OnlyCD2                     CD3CD4
Diving catch of pop up, lead runner doubled off base11 to 32            11 to 5511 to 78
No Action33 to 88            56 to 8881 to 88


10 - Use Z Chart below (go first to left column below, but it sometimes requires roll for right columns)
11 - Use Z Chart below
12 - Use Z Chart below

Random NumberIf Z Play Results, read random number below.Random

If Z Play Fielding for CD 1 or 2 (11 to 34)

Z Play Injury If CD 3 or 4 (11 to 34)

11Catcher ejected11 to 34 ignore if noone on 1st
12Pitcher ejected1114G3, runners advance3-6-3 double play
13Batter ejected15184-3 runners advance4-6-3 double play
14Single, P, C & 1b ejected21246-3 runners advance6-4-3 double play
15Batter ejected25285-3 runners advance5-4-3 double play
16Pitcher ejected31341-3 runner advance1-6-3 double play
17Walk for pitcher going to mouth



35




38

35 or higher ignore CD & check Error

1B - E0 to 3, out runners advance
35 or higher ignore CD & check Error

E4-10 Single
18Batter out for illegal bat41442B - E0 to 3, out runners advanceE4-10 Single
21Rained out4548SS - E0 to 4, out runners advanceE5-10 Single
22Rained out51543b - E0 to 5, out runners advanceE6 -10 Single
23April games only rain out5563LF - E0 to 1 OutE2-10 Double, runners score
24April games only rain out6474CF - E0 to 2 OutE3-10 Double, runners score
25April games only rain out7583RF - E0 to 2 OutE3-10 Double, runners score
26Rain delay, both pitchers PB lowered by 18487C - E0 to 3 catch in standsE4-10 foul
27Double, but if runner on 1st ruled out for batter passing88Triple Play - line out & runners doubled off
28Strikeout, wild pitch, batter safe at 1st
31Double erased, batter out for missing 1st base

If Z Play Injury

32If man on first, steals and SS ejectedInjury playPlayer hurt
33Runner out stealing second and ejected1112FoulC
34IF man on first, picked off 1-3-4-3 but a runner on 3b scores1314Foul1b
35IF man on first, picked off 1-3-6, all others advance1516Foul2b
36If man on 3rd, catcher picks off1718Foul3b
37Strikeout, passed ball batter safe at first if unoccopied or 2 outs2122FoulSS
38Single runners advance 2, but batter out rounding 1st2325DoubleLF
41Batter out for running into slow roller2628Inside Park Home RunCF
42Only runners on 1st and 2nd, grounder hits runner on 1st who is ruled out but batter gets hit3133TripleRF
43Catcher interference, batter gets 1st34FoulBatter
44
Batter out on Fan interference

3536FoulC

45 to 78

Z chart fielding (new random number, look up and right)

3741Double, runners score1b and RF

81 to 88

Z chart injury (new random number, look right)

4244Double, runners score2b and CF
4547Single, runners 2 basesSS and LF
48FoulBatter
5153Foul3b and P
5458Double, runners scoreLF and CF
6165Double, runners scoreCF and RF
6668Single, runners 1 base1b
7173Line out 2b2b
7476Line out 3b3b
7781Line out SSSS
8284FoulC
8588Double, runners scoreCF

Charts for Playing teams from different eras or level of play, as well as right-handed vs. left-handed

The advanced games show different results for batting and pitching against a left-handed or right-handed batter. However, when playing with basic cards or the cards you make by going to our link, then an adjustment for whether a pitcher is facing a right-handed or left-handed batter were always reflected in a chart summarized below. Basically, a if a batter gets to bat against a pitcher who throws the opposite (left-handed batter vs. right-handed batter or vice versa) then he gets a single on a Random Number of either 87 (with runners advancing two bases) or 88 (where they advance one base).

However, if a right-handed batter needs to face a right-handed pitcher then he is out on an 11 or 12, and a left-handed batter will have a much tougher time against a left-handed pitcher - where he is out on 11-15. A Switch hitter is never effected either way.

The additional adjustment we folded into the system is an adjustment for if a batter from a deadball era (e.g. Yaz in 1968) faces a pitcher from a live ball era (1930). In that case consult the average Runs/Game in one year. To take the most extreme case, if Yaz from 1968 were hitting against a 1930 pitcher, this would be a batter who slugged it out in a year in which 3.4 runs were being recorded per game playing in 1930 when 5.6 runs per game were being scored. The adjustment extends on the Right/Left adjustment and in this case Yaz and his teammates get doubles on 81-86. As you can see from the chart, that would result in the 1968 Red Sox adding about 2.37 runs per game over the course of the season to be on an even field with the 1930 teams.

In other years the adjustment is much less or none at all.

The other place you can use this chart is if one league is playing a league that is better (Japanese, Cuban or Mexican League against the Major Leagues) or to play college or minor leagues against each other. In most cases, you would simply need to estimate the difference between the two levels, but in other cases, you can check the math. For example, if you wanted to play an International League team, where teams average 4.15 runs per game, against a Pacific Coast team where they average 5.03, the difference of 0.88 on the chart below would result in all International League teams getting doubles on any roll or a random number of 85 or 86.

There is never an adjustment the other way - the batters in the league or year that scored MORE runs per game do not face any adjustments.


VariableRandom NumberNew ResultR/G Impact
LHP vs LN or LP Cht11-15K or Foul Out
RHP vs RN or RP Cht11-12K or Foul Out
LHP vs RN or RP Cht87-88Single
RHP vs LN or LP Cht87-88Single
Batters' Year 0.2 to 0.5 lower R/G     86Double0.35
Batters' Year 0.6 to 0.9 lower R/G85-86Double0.72
Batters' Year 1.0 to 1.3 lower R/G84-86Double1.1
Batters' Year 1.4 to 1.7 lower R/G83-86Double1.5
Batters' Year 1.8 to 2.1 lower R/G82-86Double1.92
Batters' Year 2.1+ lower R/G81-86Double2.37

Sunday, May 27, 2018

NBA Draft Raid of Nevada, Villanova and Kentucky In 24 Days Would Leave Duke No. 1

Value Add Basketball calculates Nevada, Villanova and Kentucky in the top three spots after hundreds of transfers and NBA decisions in May tracked on the google sheet of projections of all players and teams. However, multiple players on each of those teams may still leave for the NBA draft in 24 days, leaving Nevada only 71% of their current Value Add and Villanova and Kentucky 67% each.

As long as the NBA claims at least one player from each of those teams Duke will emerge as the preseason favorite. The table below shows each team's current Value Add rating, followed by their conference and the percent of their Value Add that would remain in a worst case of all their prospects turning pro. Teams cut their losses because their 9th best player moves into the rotation if the top star goes pro, and then the 10th best player if two leave for the pros etc.

NBA Draft Net projects five Duke players will be taken in the NBA Draft, but because the have committed to leave their Values are not included in Duke's 4th best 46.65 rating. However, Nevada's 52.98 top ranking assumes both 31, Cody Martin (ranked 31st with a 7.85 Value Add) and Caleb Martin (ranked 48th with a 7.51) stay - so if one or both leave Nevada would likely drop behind Duke despite solid replacements. Likewise Kentucky and Villanova.

The Big East-centric breakdown will appear on this CBS/247 site and the Facebook page.

Here is the top 25 assuming everyone stays, with the percentage each team would retain if every prospect listed departed. The ranking of all teams can be found here.

RnkTeamTop 8 VAConf% if NBA players lostPossible NBA (rank, player, Value Add)
1Nevada52.98MWC71%31, Cody Martin, 7.85 & 48, Caleb Martin, 7.51
2Villanova47.51BE67%25, Spellman, 8.01 & 32, DiVincenzo, 7.84
3Kentucky47.21SEC67%180, Washington, 5.65, 241, Vanderbilt, 5.17 & 272, Gabriel, 4.93
4Duke46.65ACC100%
5Kansas42.26B1283%64, Azubuike, 7.03
6Tennessee42.01SEC69%70, Schofield, 6.98 & 161, Alexander, 5.89
7Oregon41.52P12100%
8North Carolina40.31ACC100%
9Mississippi St.40.05SEC64%43, Holman, 7.58 & 75, Weatherspoon, 6.93
10Maryland39.36B1064%33, Huerter, 7.82 & 137, Fernando, 6.2
11Louisiana St.39.18SEC100%
12Auburn38.66SEC84%154, Wiley, 6.00
13Gonzaga37.94WCC85%183, Hachimura, 5.62
14Syracuse37.44ACC59%39, Battle, 7.7 & 40, Brissett, 7.69
15North Carolina St.35.07ACC83%168, Dorn, 5.81
16Indiana34.95B10100%
17Virginia34.62ACC81%102, Hunter, 6.55
18Texas34.28B1285%255, Roach, 5.03
19UCLA34.26P1271%238, Hands, 5.19 & 275, Wilkes, 4.91
20Kansas St.34.16B1283%165, Brown, 5.84
21Michigan St.33.63B1080%90, Ward, 6.64
22Virginia Tech33.49ACC87%381, Alexander-Walker, 4.25
23Marquette33.13BE100%
24Florida32.73SEC80%93, Hudson, 6.61
25Iowa32.49B10100%

Tuesday, May 1, 2018

3 New Yankees Sluggers Give Edge Over Astros; Red Sox and Indians Round Out For AL Contenders based on Statis-Pro

Unlike other tabletop baseball games, Statis-Pro player cards enable fans to quickly grasp the value of a player. An average pitcher had a PB of 2-6, meaning he controlled the game on the card equivalent of a dice roll of 2-6, but a pitcher card with a 2-9 indicated he only risks hitting the batter's card on the equivalent of a 10, 11 or 12 roll to rate as one of the top 5% of all pitchers.

When a pitcher allows the batters' card to come into play yields an average home run range is 27-32 - actually four home runs out of 64 possible results on the base-8 system (there is no 29 or 30 combo). If you take 30 seconds to type in 9 MLB projected stats to let the google sheet calculate crude cards for Yankee rookies Miguel Andujar and Tyler Austin you see they have fantastic home run ranges of 32-36 and 24-32 respectively. Add the massive Home Run range of 22-34 Giancarlo Stanton who came to the Yankees from Miami after leading baseball in home runs and you realize the new Yankees lineup looks more like the 1927 Yankees than the team that just missed the World Series last year with Aaron Judge and company.


Looking through the cards of the strong players (2-8 or 2-9 pitchers or strong home run/hit range) gained or lost to adjust for how much a team's cards look better or worse than last year, the Statis-Pro rosters rank the Cleveland Indians as tops due to incredible pitching from starters to relievers, and the Yankees seem to be second best behind that line-up with the Astros and Red Sox right behind them and the Angels improved enough to perhaps sneak in as the final wild-card team.

In real life after one month, the first four playoff teams match-up but the Seattle Mariners are ahead of the Angels for the final spot. However, the Indians would only make the playoffs due to the AL Central being very weak, and the Astros starting rotation that looks just above average is actually lights out (top trio is 10-1 with a 1.50 ERA vs. going 55-49 with a 3.88 ERA in their combined two seasons before joining the Astros.

At the end of the season, we will see if the final standings are closer to what they are now or to how good the cards look from last year moved to their current rosters as reflected below. You can play Statis-Pro here or by finding an old game on-line, and you can order cards or make your own using this google sheet. (Notes on my Statis-Pro season are kept here)


TeamRating2017 WLBig additions (or full seasons)Losses
Cleveland Indians10.010260Chisenhall 28-35 PT, Alonso 24-32Robertson R 2-8 FA
New York Yankees9.09171New Stanton (Mia) 22-34 fr Mia, Andujar 31-35, 27-37Castro 36-41 to Mia
Houston Astros8.610161Stassi 26-33None
Boston Red Sox8.69369Martinez 25-38 Com, Velazquez 2-8R PT,None
Los Angeles Angels8.08082Cozart (Cin) 31-36, Upton 26-34 Det, Ohtani 34-38 & 2-8S Japan, Richards 2-8 S PTPetit 2-8 Rel to Oak
Minnesota Twins6.28577Reed 2-8 Mets, Morrison 21-28W TBNone
Seattle Mariners5.27884Nicasio 2-8R Com, Leake 2-8 S PT, Healy 32-36 Oak, Gordon 42 a/a fr MiaZych 2-8 R FA
Toronto Blue Jays4.87686Hernandez 22-34 PT, Grichuk 24-31 StLRasmus 27-37 PT to Bal, Leone 2-8R to St Louis
Texas Rangers4.47884Minor 2-8R KCNone
Baltimore Orioles4.27587Rasmus 27-37 TB/PT, Beckman 35-42 PTCastillo 31-37 CWS
Chicago White Sox3.86795Delmonico 24-32 PT, Castillo 31-37 Balt, Gioliti 2-8 StPT, Avila 2-8 RelLAD,Cabrera 35-38 Free agent
Oakland Athletics3.47587Olson 15-32 PT, Petit 2-8 Rel LAAAlonso 24-33 to Cle , Madson 2-9 to Wash, Healy 32-36 Oak to Sea
Kansas City Royals2.88082Hosmer 36-42 to SD, Alexander 2-8 Rel LAD, Minor 2-8R Tex
Tampa Bay Rays2.48082Wendell 42-43Morrison 21-28W to Minn, Dickerson 33-37 to Pitt, Hunter to Phillies 2-8R, Cishek 2-9R PT,
Detroit Tigers0.06498CAldelario 41-42 PT,JD Martinez 27-37 PT, Upton 27-35W
AL Average5.481.780.3Ave. AL Batting Card 27-32 HR, Pitcher 2-6