Friday, June 14, 2024

ODU 1997 that fell to All-Time Greatest Team (Tennessee late 90s) Moves Up to 12th All-time with VABG Win Over UNC 2007

 A couple of 20th century teams were upset recently in their Value Add Basketball GameValue Add Basketball Game debuts against all-time great teams, but the Old Dominion 1997 team pulled away from UNC 2007 by a 85-69 to move up to No. 12 in our all-time rankings. 

Like Caitlin Clark's breakthrough 2024 title game against South Carolina, the 1997 title game 1997 title game stunned the world by outdrawing the men's title (which happened to be the last Pac-12 men's title (Arizona). 

This was the true changing of the guard in a great game between the last of the mid-major dynasty teams (Louisiana Tech, ODU, Long Beach State) before Tennessee and then other big programs took over. This game came down to the final few minutes before the Vols defeated ODU for their 2nd of three straight titles. We rank the real Tennessee team from the next year - 1998 - as the greatest team in history right now and do not use teams with overlapping players and thus do not have the actual 1996 and 1997 team in the game.

This ODU team that almost beat them ranks just 11 spots further back at #12 all-time in the game, though this does not count the overlapping teams, so this ODU team would actually rank 26th if you could these there Tennessee teams, then the UConn 2000, 2002,  2003 and 2004 etc. on the rankings below.


    
RnkTeam (other top 50 team yrs)WLScoreAllowBest Players (rank if top 40 all-time)
1Tennessee 1998 (1996, 1997)4076.364.0Tamika CatchingsChamique Holdsclaw., No. 1, 21 best
2Connecticut 2002 (2000, 2003, 2004)1075.046.0Sue BirdDiana Taurasi, 3, 7 best
3Tennessee 2007 (2008)1089.070.0Candace Parker, 10 best
4Texas 19861076.066.0Clarissa Davis, 40 best
5Louisiana Tech 19823176.067.5Pam Kelly., 11 best
6South Carolina 2024 (2023)1084.055.0Kamilla Cardoso
7Connecticut 19951081.057.0Nykesha SalesRebecca Lobo, 31, 37 bests
8Connecticut 2016 (2014, 2015, 2017, 2018)1180.064.5Maya MooreKatie Lou Samuelson, 2, 22 best
9Notre Dame 20183176.372.8Arike Ogunbowales
10Connecticut 2010 (2009, 2011, 2013)2173.373.3Breanna Stewart, 4 best
11USC 1983 (1984)2172.063.3Cheryl Miller, Cynthia Cooper, 9, 25 best
12Old Dominion 19971085.069.0Ticha Penicheiro
13Stanford 20211179.072.5Kiana Williams
14Louisiana Tech 1988 (1990)1080.064.0Teresa Weatherspoon
15LSU 20231089.061.0Angel Reese, 23 best
16Baylor 2012 (2011, 2013)1173.577.0Kalani Brown
17Tennessee 1989 (1987, 1991)0164.068.0Bridgette Gordon
18Iowa 20241084.064.0Caitlin Clark, 8 best
19Auburn 19891066.062.0Carolyn Jones
20Notre Dame 2012 (2014)0170.078.0Kylar Diggins
21Baylor 2019 (2017, 2018, 2020)1174.073.0Brittney Griner, 6 best
22Oregon 2019 (2020)0181.084.0Sabrina Ionescu, 14 best
23Texas A&M 20110169.076.0Danielle Adams
24Vanderbilt 20021076.065.0Chantelle Anderson
25Notre Dame 20011080.076.0Ruth Riley, 32 best
26Mississippi State 20180158.074.0Victoria Vivans
27Virginia 19911076.072.0Dawn Staley, 20 best
28Old Dominion 19850168.074.0Adrienne Goodson
29Maryland 200600  Crystal Langhorne
30Ohio State 19930165.076.0Katie Smith, 27 best
31Marquette 20191068.064.0Chloe Marotta, Natisha Hiedeman
32Indiana 20241078.070.0MacKenzie Holmes
33Old Dominion 19800155.080.0Nancy Lieberman, 12 best
34Michigan St. 200500  Liz Shimek
35LSU 200500  Sylvia FowlesSeimone Augustus, 39, 34 best
36South Carolina 2017 (2019)1169.073.5A'ja Wilson, 5 best
37Duke 20060166.075.0Alison Bales
38UCLA 20181071.063.0Monique Billings
39NC State 202400  Aziaha James
40Rutgers 200500  Cappie Pondexter, 36 best
41Louisville 20090074.068.0Angel McCoughtry, 38 best
42Stanford 201200  Nnemkadi Ogwumike, 24 best
43Washington 20170157.064.0Kelsey Plum, 15 best
44Louisville 20140169.076.0Shoni Schimmel
45Kentucky 201300  DeNesha Stallworth
46Georgia 20130170.089.0Jasmine James
47Oklahoma 20100166.076.0Abi Olajuwon
48Texas Tech 199300  Sheryl Swoopes, 18 best
49Colorado St. 199900  Becky Hammon, 19 best
50Rutgers 19880162.066.0Sue Wicks, 29 best
51Oklahoma 200200  Stacey Dales
52Virginia Tech 20240176.080.0Elizabeth Kitley
53USC 19940163.071.0Lisa LeslieTina Thompson, 26, 33 best
54Texas 20180162.084.0Ariel Atkins
55Minnesota 20040172.076.0Lindsay Whalen, 30 best
56Ohio State 20160168.079.0Kelsey Mitchell
57Long Beach State 19870153.098.0Penny Toler, Cindy Brown, 17, 28 best
58North Carolina 20070169.085.0Ivory Latta, 35 best
59Arizona 20210164.080.0Aari McDonald
60Penn State 20120164.084.0Maggie Lucas
61Purdue 20030161.089.0Shereka Wright
62Delaware 20130146.075.0Elena Delle Donne, 13 best
63Virginia 20180157.081.0Dominique Toussaint
64Auburn 20090155.084.0Keke Carrier, DeWanna Bonner





Ticha Penicheiro scored 16 points as the point guard, and combined with the two bigs and leading scorers in 6'5 Clarisse Machanguana (16 points) and 6'4 Nyree Roberts (20 points) took over to pull away. The scoresheet is pasted below the updated all-time rankings. Only 10 teams have yet to play in the game.


Wednesday, June 12, 2024

Not Having to Face UConn, Louisville ladies top ODU

 ODU won the NCAA tournament in 1985, while Louisville finished 2nd in the Big East, lost the BIG East title game, and lost the NCAA title game.

Note - our apologies, we noticed a couple of the women's team sheets were coming up as requiring an access request. You should be able to access all now.

Of course, all three of those runner up finishes were to the 39-0 UConn team in the midst of dominating women's hoops. If the Cardinals could have beaten anyone else, they may have been right. In our Value Add Basketball game Angel McCoughtry dominated with 22 points, 5 steals, 8 rebounds and 2 blocked shots to advance 74-68 over ODU.

We did catch two mistakes on the two of Louisville's reserves - very minor but we had some missed 2 points shots and missed 3 points shots so corrected that as shown in the photo.





Sunday, June 9, 2024

Indiana 2024 Team that Crushed Caitlin Clark & Tennessee and Gave SC Scare - stuns ND in our Game

The last double digit underdog to play their Value Add Basketball Game Value Add Basketball Game debut won to make the group 14-79, a little better than the 9.3 wins we would expect from double digit underdogs we would expect in 93 such games, but perhaps not that big a surprise for anyone who watched the Indiana Ladies this season.

The two teams that came closest to beating undefeated South Carolina during the 2024 season were Tennessee (one point loss) and this Indiana team (75-79 loss). 

Indiana also had dominant double digit wins against that Tennessee team (71-57) as well as a late season destruction of Caitlin Clark and Iowa (86-69). Given those three results it shouldn't come as a big surprise they were able to upset the 2012 runners up from Notre Dame - which lost to Baylor in the title game that year, 61-80.

Yarden Garzon hit five of six 3-pointers in the real season upset of Tennessee, and she hit a couple of 3-pointers in this one as well and grabbed 8 rebounds with 15 points in the simulated game win over Notre Dame 2012.

Sara Scalia led the simulated game with a game-high 19 points in the win over Notre Dame. In the real season she outscored Caitlin Clark despite taking barely half as many shots - going 7 of 14 while frustrating Clark for an 8 of 26 night for a dominant 86-69 win.

While there have been a few more big upsets in the game than real life, overall the underdog has won exactly how many would be expected over these first 290 games - 80 wins - as shown on the table below.

We only have seven debut games left, and there are no more big underdogs. One of those seven features teams that are exactly even, while the other six have only slight favorites as shown below. The box score of our game is at the bottom.

VABG Double Digit UnderdogsFinal Heavy UnderdogsExpected UpsetsActual Upsetskenpom 10% chance (ave 14.5 pts)
1st 88 double digit underdogs 888.81212-76 record in 1st 88
Oklahoma 2010 vs Tex 1986L 66-76898.912Abi Olajuwon
Marquette 2019 vs. TN 1989W 68-6490913"Natisha Hiedeman
"
Arizona 2021 vs. La Tech 1988L 64-80919.113Aari McDonald
Rutgers 1988 vs Auburn 1989L 62-66929.213Sue Wicks
Indiana 2024 vs. ND 2012 W78-70939.314MacKenzie Holmes
      
VABG Medium (7-9 pt) underdogs Medium UnderdogsExpected UpsetsActual Upsetskenpom 23% chance upset
1st 48 Medium Underdogs 48111111-37 record in 1st 48
      
VABG Slight (1-6 pt) underdogs Slight UnderdogsExpected UpsetsActual Upsetskenpom 40% chance upset
1st 148 slight underdogs (1-6 pts) 14859.25454-94 record in 1st 148 games
Vanderbilt 2002 vs OSU 1993W 76-6514959.655Chantelle Anderson
North Carolina 2007 vs. ODU 1997 15060TBDIvory Latta
Louisville 2009 vs. ODU 1985 15160.4TBDAngel McCoughtry
LSU 2005 vs. Kentucky 2013 15260.8TBDSylvia FowlesSeimone Augustus
Colorado St. 1999 vs. Stan 2012 15361.2TBDBecky Hammon
NC State 2024 vs. MD 2006 15461.6TBDAziaha James
Rutgers 2005 vs MSU 2005 1556255 to 61Cappie Poindexter
      
Total Underdog Record 29079.88078-207 record in 1st 285 games
      
21 even games (no favorite) 2121 kenpom 50% no favorite

Box Score.

 
Indiana 2024                          Pts   3pt  2pt  FTAtt  RebStlBlkFl         Ht, Pts, Reb, Ast
Chloe Moore-McNeil6030012025'11, 10.2, 3.6, 5.0
Sara Scalia19091132015'10, 16.3, 3.8, 2.4
Yarden Garzon15233480026'3, 11.7, 4.4, 3.1
Sydney Parrish7112240036'2, 10.8, 6.0, 2.3
MacKenzie Holmes13053441346'3, 19.8, 6.8, 1.4
BenchPts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
Lexus Bargesser10050030025'9, 4.3, 2.7, 2.8
Lenée Beaumont2010010016'1, 3.0, 0.7, 0.6
Julianna LaMendola2010010016'1, 1.8, 1.9, 0.7
Henna Sandvik2010010016'0, 0.9, 0.7, 0.5
Lilly Meister2010010016'3, 3.7, 2.7, 0.3
 78330911275318 
           
Notre Dame 2012Pts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
Skylar Diggins10042211015'9, 16.8, 3.3, 5.7
Brittany Mallory11310043125'10, 5.8, 2.7, 2.3
Natalie Novosel8032243125'11, 15.2, 4.1, 2.0
Kayla McBride6022241025'11, 11.6, 4.6, 1.7
Devereaux Peters10042480316'2, 11.8, 9.3, 2.1
BenchPts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
Kaila Turner7112210015'8, 3.4, 1.2, 0.9
Whitney Holloway2010010015'4, 1.0, 0.9, 0.7
Fraderica Miller2010010015'10, 1.9, 2.5, 0.9
Natalie Achonwa12044430036'3, 7.6, 4.4, 1.4
Markisha Wright2010010016'2, 3.3, 2.1, 0.3
19 Turnovers704221416288515
ccc

Saturday, June 8, 2024

Update All-Time 64 Women's Bracket After La Tech 1988 Bigs Dominate Arizona 2021, Wins Going Away 80-64

Update: Vandy 76, Ohio State 65 in Midwest action. Scroll to bottom for score sheet.

We are recording all results of our Value Add Basketball Game all-time championship between the 64 teams in the game. The following is a paragraph on each region with the games between debut teams and a link to each region's bracket:

In our all-time South Region Championship, Louisiana Tech's 1988 squad dominated the boards 42-27 to pull away from Arizona's 2021 surprise national runner-up 80-64. Three teams rotated in first place from late in the 1988 season through all of the 1989 and 1990 seasons - La Tech, Auburn and Tennessee - but the win moved La Tech ahead of the other two in the game and to 14th all-time in our game. The Vols were stunned and Auburn barely survived in previous games to let La Tech pass them both.

In the West Region, debut games results included Texas (1986) 76, Oklahoma (2010) 66  and UCLA (2018) 71, USC (1994) 63.  Stanford 2012 vs. Colorado State 1999 is the last game of teams who have not played in addition to the other five first round games to be played.

In the East Region,  the closer-than-expected Auburn (1989) 66, Rutgers (1988) 62 game is one of four debut games. The women's NC State 2024 team was a big surprise just like the men and they will take on Maryland 2006. Old Dominion already has the first team in the game, and we add two more teams with their 1985 team plays Louisville 2009 and then their 1997 plays UNC 2007 in addition to four other games between teams who have already played Value Add Basketball Games. 

In the Midwest Region, it was the huge upset Marquette (2019) 68, Tennessee (1989) 64. three debut games remain including a new entry 2024 Indiana vs. Notre Dame 2012, Ohio State 1993 vs Vanderbilt 2002 and the seeding aligned two 2005 teams in Rutgers vs. Michigan State. The two did not actually play that year as Rutgers was still in the Big East and thus not yet in the Big Ten with the Spartans. There will be four other games in that bracket between teams who have played in our game.

Here is the box score form Louisiana Tech.

Pos            Arizona 2021               Pts  3pt2ptFTAtt   RebStlBlkFl    Ht, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGAari McDonald23370054135'6, 20.6, 5.4, 4.0
2-SGBendu Yeaney9033421415'10, 4.1, 3.1, 1.5
3-SFSam Thomas4020040246'0, 7.3, 3.4, 1.5
4-PFTrinity Baptiste8024461116'0, 8.6, 6.1, 1.0
5-CCate Reese8022250026'2, 10.9, 5.1, 0.6
PosBenchPts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGDerin Erdogan2010010015'6, 1.0, 0.5, 0.4
2-SGShaina Pellington4020010025'8, 5.8, 1.9, 1.0
3-SFHelena Pueyo2010010016'0, 3.7, 3.5, 1.3
4-PFLauren Ware2020010236'5, 3.9, 3.8, 0.3
5-CSemaj Smith2010010016'6, 0.9, 1.2, 0.1
 16 Turnovers643239102761019 
            
PosLa Tech 1988Pts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGTeresa Weatherspoon9033525015'8, 9.1, 4.4, 6.0
2-SGAngela Lawson10042223035'8, 11.2, 3.6, 3.9
3-SFErica Westbrooks140623110116'3, 14.6, 7.2, 1.2
4-PFNora Lewis121412110036'0, 13.6, 9.8, 1.5
5-CVenus Lacy17081180326'4, 14.5, 9.2, 0.5
PosBenchPts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGTatia Brown2010010015'10, 4.2, 0.4, 0.6
2-SGPaulette Stall4020011015'10, 6.0, 2.9, 2.2
3-SFSheila Ethridge6014420015'8, 7.9, 3.5, 0.9
4-PFBeanie Lincoln4020020015'11, 3.0, 2.2, 0.4
5-CJocelyn Watson2010020016'0, 4.3, 2.6, 0.4
 19 Turnovers801321317429415

We still have nine games to play between 0-0 teams.




Vanderbilt upset Ohio State 76-65 - scoresheet at bottom


After this originally posted, the 2002 Vanderbilt team pulled a minor upset, 76-65, over the 1993 Ohio State team. Candy improved from 39th to 25th, while OSU fell from 29th to 45th in our all-time rankings.

OSU actually lost that year by 3 points at Vandy, and then both teams went to the final 4 but both lost in the semifinals. However, in a close call we went with this Vandy team from 9 years later for the game.

Vandy will face the Marquette 2019 team that pulled our biggest upset so far over Tennessee.





Friday, June 7, 2024

4-seed Auburn 1989 survives 10-0 run to hold off 13-seed Rutgers 1988

Pos            Auburn 1989                   Pts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGRuthie Bolton4020062025'8, 7.9, 4.2, 5.7
2-SGPatrena Scruggs19091161025'9, 10.2, 4.6, 1.9
3-SFCarolyn Jones9041250135'8, 14.5, 4.4, 1.7
4-PFLinda Godby6030040116'5, 11.4, 4.8, 0.4
5-CVickie Orr120524112416'3, 15.9, 8.6, 0.4
PosBenchPts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGLynn Stevenson4020010015'8, 2.2, 1.4, 1.7
2-SGChantel Tremitiere2010010015'6, 1.9, 1.7, 1.6
3-SFEvelyn Thompson4020020015'9, 4.8, 2.0, 1.1
4-PFJocelyn McGilberry4020030016'0, 7.6, 6.3, 0.6
5-CKendall Mago2010010016'4, 3.3, 3.5, 0.3
 20 Turnovers6603147405614 
            
PosRutgers 1988Pts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGJanet Malouf6030233015'6, 6.4, 2.6, 5.9
2-SGTelicher Austin2010032025'9, 13.5, 3.9, 3.6
3-SFSue Wicks220102410016'3, 25.6, 12.1, 2.6
4-PFVicky Picott2010040016'0, 11.4, 7.8, 1.3
5-CMichelle Lender18090082036'2, 12.2, 5.2, 1.3
PosBenchPts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGGlorisa Catala2010010015'6, 3.3, 0.9, 1.0
2-SGJill Shildt4020010015'9, 3.7, 2.2, 1.8
3-SFSuzanne Cooper2010010015'9, 2.8, 1.5, 1.0
4-PFLynn Ust2010020015'11, 5.2, 2.8, 1.6
5-CWendy Porter2010010016'1, 2.1, 2.3, 0.4
 11 Turnovers5802826257013

Update: Auburn 1989 survived another scare by a double digit underdogs, after Rutgers went on a 10-0 fueled Sue Wicks of Rutgers 1988. Shot blockers Linda Godby and Vickie Orr held Rutgers back for most of the game to give Auburn a 46-42 lead, until the 10-0 run gave Rutgers a 52-56 lead.  However, Auburn survived 66-62 behind a double double by Vickie Orr (12 points, 11 rebounds) and Patrena Scruggs 19 points).

The closer-than-expected game drops Auburn from 14th to 21st in our all-time rankings, while Rutgers improved slightly from 50th to 47th. All ratings and games are tracked here. We temporarily posted incorrect info for this game because we had flipped the teams and their lay-up ranges for the game (had Rutgers with a 51-62 and Auburn with a 51-55 instead of the reverse). If that was the case then Rutgers would have won 66-62, but when we reran the die rolls with the corrected ranges is actually shifted to a mirror 66-62 Auburn win so they advance.

Here was the preview first.

Our next debut Value Add Basketball Game Value Add Basketball Game all-time match-up is from our Eastern Region bracket with the all-time 4-seed 1989 Auburn team playing a contemporary - the 13-seed Rutgers 1988.

 From the last few weeks of the 1987-88 season through the end of the 1989-90 season, either Tennessee, Louisiana Tech or Auburn was ranked No. 1 every week. Auburn not only beat those two great teams, but made the national championship game all three years.

In my book, making the national title game three years in a row is much more impressive than winning one title, so Auburn ranks as one of the greatest teams in history with the three straight national runners-up banners hanging in their arena even though they did not win any of the three title games.

Rutgers broke the top 10 for a few weeks during that time and goes in as a double digit (11-point) underdog. However, this game follows up a double digit upset by Marquette 2019 over one of those other three great teams from those three years (Tennessee 1989) to make double digit underdogs 13-76, so Rutgers will try to make it two straight big upsets.




Pos            Auburn 1989                   Ht, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGRuthie Bolton5'8, 7.9, 4.2, 5.7
2-SGPatrena Scruggs5'9, 10.2, 4.6, 1.9
3-SFCarolyn Jones5'8, 14.5, 4.4, 1.7
4-PFLinda Godby6'5, 11.4, 4.8, 0.4
5-CVickie Orr6'3, 15.9, 8.6, 0.4
PosBenchHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGLynn Stevenson5'8, 2.2, 1.4, 1.7
2-SGChantel Tremitiere5'6, 1.9, 1.7, 1.6
3-SFEvelyn Thompson5'9, 4.8, 2.0, 1.1
4-PFJocelyn McGilberry6'0, 7.6, 6.3, 0.6
5-CKendall Mago6'4, 3.3, 3.5, 0.3
   
PosRutgers 1988Ht, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGJanet Malouf5'6, 6.4, 2.6, 5.9
2-SGTelicher Austin5'9, 13.5, 3.9, 3.6
3-SFSue Wicks6'3, 25.6, 12.1, 2.6
4-PFVicky Picott6'0, 11.4, 7.8, 1.3
5-CMichelle Lender6'2, 12.2, 5.2, 1.3
PosBenchHt, Pts, Reb, Ast
1-PGGlorisa Catala5'6, 3.3, 0.9, 1.0
2-SGJill Shildt5'9, 3.7, 2.2, 1.8
3-SFSuzanne Cooper5'9, 2.8, 1.5, 1.0
4-PFLynn Ust5'11, 5.2, 2.8, 1.6
5-CWendy Porter6'1, 2.1, 2.3, 0.4

Thursday, June 6, 2024

Extremely Accurate Value Add Basketball Games Yields 13th Double Digit Upset in 89 Games

 The Marquette vs Tennessee game was the 307th game we have played since inventing the Value Add Basketball Game in 2020. Click for all women's results or men's results and the teams updated rankings based on results.


So far the underdog is almost exactly as likely to pull and upset in a Value Add Basketball Game as they are in real college basketball games.

To determine the favorite in a game take the rating of one team and subtract from the rating of the other team (so if one team is a +7 and the opponent is a -3 rating above the cards, then the first team is a 10-point favorite). 

We play most games on a neutral site, but if you choose to make one team the home team, the adjust the point spread by 3 points in their favor and allow that team to change any die roll from 36 to 66 and vice versa. This recreates the average 2 to 3 more missed or false foul calls that go in the home teams advantage per actual game (in fact the home team might get 7 missed calls in their favor and the visiting team get 4 in their favor, but we just make it average 3 and 0 for the. Same effect).

In 21 of our 307 games played to date teams had the same rating, so in those games there is no favorite. The following table breaks down the results to date based on if a team is favored by 1 to 6 points, by 7 to 9 points or by double digits:

The Value Add Basketball Games proves perhaps the most accurate simulation game available through more than 300 games played since its invention.

The ratings of each team based on the cards compiled from each player's stats and level of competition and era factors provide a quick calculation of a predicted point spread between each two teams in a game.

So far, those spreads have proven extremely accurate.

In 148 games one team has been a narrow favorite (1 to 6 points, an average of 3.5 point favorite). Based on www.kenpom.com calculations, we would expect the favored team to win 60% and go 89-59. The favorites have done very slightly better, winning five more games than expected to go 94-54 so far.

In 48 games one team was favored by 7-9 points, which means www.kenpom.com would project the favorites would win 77% to go 37-11 and ... that is an exact. The Value Add favorites have gone exactly 37-11 in those games.

Finally in 89 Value Add Basketball Games one team has been favored by double digits - an average 14.6 point favorite, and in those games www.kenpom.com would predict the favorites would win 90% of their games to go 80-9 - but in fact there have been for more upsets than expected in those games to leave favorites 76-13.

Favorite                               Wins   Losses  VABG Win%       Actual Basketball Win%                 
10 pts + (ave. 14.6)761385%90% (real chance if 14.5 pt favorite)
7 to 9 points371177%77% (exact match of real chance 8pt)
1 to 6 points945464%60% (real chance if 3.5 pt favorite)
Total Favorites Record        2077873%

Based on spreads, Value Add favorites should have gone 206-79, but have actually gone 207-78.

The 13 games in which a team pulled a double digit upset follow. This could have been due to a great run of dice rolls that will likely even out if the teams play a few more games, or because we underestimated or overestimated one of the teams.

However, with the Colorado 2021, Auburn 2019 and Michigan State 2009 teams all pulling multiple double digit upsets and the 2006 Florida Gators being the victim multiple times, we tweak their rankings and see how their future games play out.

Double Digit Upsets                                              Score                Defeated                                           
Auburn, Men, 2019, Chuma OkekeWon 73 to 69Florida, 2006, Joakim Noah
Auburn, Men, 2019, Chuma OkekeWon 87 to 81Florida, 2006, Joakim Noah
Auburn, Men, 2019, Chuma OkekeWon 75 to 68Kentucky, 2012, Anthony Davis
Colorado, Men, 2021, McKinley WrightWon 86 to 82Illinois, 1989, Nick Anderson
Colorado, Men, 2021, McKinley WrightWon 72 to 70Minnesota, 1977, Kevin McHale
Davidson, Men, 2008, Stephen CurryWon 68 to 52Florida, 2006, Joakim Noah
DePaul, Men, 1980, Mark AguirreWon 86 to 71UCLA, 1967, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
Marquette, Women, 2019, Natisha HiedemanWon 68 to 64Tennessee, 1989, Bridgette Gordon
Michigan St., Men, 2009, Draymond GreenWon 70 to 68Indiana, 1976, Scott May
Michigan St., Men, 2009, Draymond GreenWon 79 to 78Ohio St., 1960, John Havlicek
Notre Dame, Women, 2018, Arike OgunbowalesWon 76 to 62Connecticut, 2016, Maya Moore
UTEP (Texas West), Men, 1966, Bobby Joe HillWon 71 to 70UNLV, 1991, Larry Johnson
Wake Forest, Men, 1996, Tim DuncanWon 67 to 64Kentucky, 1996, Antoine Walker


Wednesday, June 5, 2024

Double Digit Underdog Marquette 2019 Rains in 3s vs. Tennessee 1989 in All-Time Midwest Women's Clash

First we will show the playing cards for our all-time Midwest game between our 15-seed Marquette 2019 team and our 2-seed Tennessee 1989 team. While double digit underdogs like MU in this game came in only 12-76 in our game, this was a thriller Value Add Basketball Game as you can see when you scroll down.

The three Tennessee teams in the game coached by Pat Summitt's, with the all time record of 1,098-208, are now 5-1 in our game.

We did catch on slight mistake on a card we will fix (the biggest reason we try to play every team once in the game). Marquette Center Erika Davenport was listed as Suggested Play 27-1. meaning the final 27 possessions of the game. We will correct that to have her suggested play be 44-30 (the first 15 possessions of a game) and then 11-1) which lets super sub and 3-point specialist Selena Lott stay on with a smaller line-up while Davenport is resting from the 29th to 12th possession counting down.

As you can see from the screen shots of the two teams' player cards, the 1989 Tennessee team is rated a +13 while the 2019 Marquette team is a -5, so we expect Tennessee to be about an 18-point favorite. This just means Marquette ranks as about 5 points worse than the average GREAT team in the game. Obviously they were a very good team and during the season they won their average game 82-62.

Above the actual Tennessee player cards you see other notes such as that we rank this as the 7th greatest all-time team in the game, and the fact that we only take one great team per school from a great program means we chose this 1989 team instead of the two other great teams from 1987 or 1991.




Double digit underdogs are 13-76 in our all-time Great Value Add Basketball games, but the Marquette 2019 team came out and did three things that can lead to upsets; 1) from the 40th to the 16th possessions they hit an incredible eight 3-pointers  (so eight 3-pointers in 25 total possessions); 2) They got the opposing superstar Bridgette Gordon in foul trouble early, and 3) they forced 21 turnovers. 

If you look at the suggested possessions played you will see that the five Tennessee subs all played the first seven possessions (44 down to 38) and Marquette's future WNBA player Natisha Hiedeman had just hit a 3-pointer to put Marquette up 32-24 when all the Tennessee starters came in to play possessions 37 to 1 and finish the game.

The Vols put on a tremendous run led by several of Bridgette Gordon's six steals in the closing minutes converted into baskets at the other end as the Vols won the last 3 minutes of the game 8-2 but Marquette held them off for a 68-64 win to advance as the big upset 15-seed winner.'

Freshman and future star Chloe Marotta score the first two baskets, and another bench player Selena Lott who always played most of games but off the bench had the four 3-pointers that sent Marquette to the double digit lead. However, down the stretch it was the all-senior starting five that held off the huge Tennessee run and will now await the winner of the Midwest 7-seed vs. 10-seed game between Ohio State 1993 and Vanderbilt 2002. While an underdog against an all-time great, this MU team rose to No. 8 in the polls and lost by only 5 points at #6 Mississippi State, beat a ranked DePaul team 2 of 3 including a 33-point win, and beat a ranked Rice team in Texas in the first round of the NCAA before losing just 76-78 at a ranked Texas A&M team to just miss the Sweet 16.

Pat Summitt's three teams in the game were probably due for one loss, as they were 5-0 and all three ranked in our top seven teams of all time before this loss, as tracked on our record of scores. Likewise the Marquette program was likely due for a win as the all-time great men's results nullshow the Marquette teams of Dwyane Wade, national champ Butch Lee and Bo Ellis and others are 8-9 in the game. 

The win shoots Marquette from 50th to 30th in our rankings, while Tennessee drops from 7th to 17th. This is a jump similar to when Mark Aguirre and Terry Cummings DePaul team shocked Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's UCLA team. With Tennessee dropping, UConn now has three of the top eight teams and four of the top 10 teams in history in our game. All 13 double digit upsets are listed here.
 
                                      Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4   F
Marquette 20191423181368
Tennessee 19891413211664


Pos        Marquette 2019            Pts   3pt  2pt  FT Att  Reb Stl  Blk  Fl    Ht,Pts,Reb,Ast     
1-PGDanielle King7120034025'5, 11.9, 4.0, 3.6
2-SGNatisha Hiedeman16234412125'8, 17.6, 6.1, 4.5
3-SFAmani Wilborn6030031115'9, 11.5, 4.1, 3.3
4-PFAllazia Blockton4020050026'0, 14.3, 4.3, 2.2
5-CErika Davenport2010050025'11, 11.9, 9.4, 1.1
PosBenchPts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt,Pts,Reb,Ast
1-PGSelena Lott18430032015'11, 7.1, 3.3, 1.4
2-SGIsabelle Spingola5110020016'0, 5.2, 2.2, 0.5
3-SFChloe Marotta6030020026'1, 2.6, 2.3, 0.3
4-PFAltia Anderson2010010016'2, 0.9, 2.1, 0.2
5-CLauren Van Kleunen2010010016'2, 4.5, 3.7, 0.8
 13 Turnovers6882044269215 
            
PosTennessee 1989Pts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt,Pts,Reb,Ast
1-PGTonya Edwards4012212015'10, 9.7, 3.0, 3.4
2-SGDena Head5110031015'10, 6.4, 3.0, 3.0
3-SFBridgette Gordon18341176046'0, 20.4, 7.0, 2.7
4-PFSheila Frost12060090516'4, 13.7, 6.7, 0.9
5-CDaedra Charles11051550016'3, 9.8, 6.7, 0.7
PosBenchPts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt,Pts,Reb,Ast
1-PGMelissa McCray2010010015'10, 6.4, 3.1, 3.6
2-SGDebbie Scott2010010016'1, 4.5, 1.8, 1.0
3-SFRegina Clark6030020015'8, 5.1, 2.2, 1.1
4-PFCarla McGhee2010010016'3, 5.3, 5.4, 1.2
5-CKelli Casteel2010020016'2, 3.8, 1.9, 0.1
 21 Turnovers6442448329513