Showing posts with label Delaware basketball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Delaware basketball. Show all posts

Monday, September 14, 2026

Epic Candace Parker vs. Elena Delle Donne Clash While Vols Rout Delaware 76-42

Epic Candace Parker vs. Elena Delle Donne

While this game was a blowout from the beginning, as the Tennessee 2007 team, ranked No. 3 all-time in our rankings, easily covered the 25-point spread despite traveling to Delaware, it was fun to imagine this Value Add Basketball Game despite the 76-42 final score. The 2007 season was the first of Pat Summitt's final two national titles, which happened in back-to-back seasons. And after our No. 1-ranked Vols team from a decade earlier came nowhere near covering its spread, it does raise the question of whether this could be the top women's team of all time or if that distinction belongs to one of the UConn teams.

The first fun part of imagining this game is imagining a trip by Pat Summitt and the Vols into a mid-major arena that usually draws about 1,200 fans for mid-major games, compared to the 15,000+ who come out for UConn and Tennessee games. Only once did Delaware draw more than 5,000 fans, and that was when they got a top-10 Maryland team to drive 60 miles to play while Delle Donne was there, and the Terps beat them by double digits. So this game would never happen, and that's why it's fun to imagine it in a Value Add Basketball Game.

The next item is the matchup of the two players we play at the 4 (power forward): Elena Delle Donne, who we rank as the 12th-greatest college player in history, and, of course, Tennessee's Candace Parker, who we rank as the 10th-greatest college player in our all-time top 40. Even as the five future WNBA players on the court for Tennessee dominated the four non-WNBA starters for mid-major Delaware, the Parker vs. Delle Donne matchup was epic. Both drew three first-half fouls on each other, while Parker had the 11-point, 7-rebound advantage over Delle Donne's 6 points and 2 rebounds.

Then in the second half, the tables turned with what looked like a little home cooking. In the first apparent bad call of the game, Parker drove to the hoop and scored to make it 53-32 Vols, BUT Delle Donne appeared to foul her, so it should have been an and-one and a fourth foul on Delle Donne. A 36 roll on defense can be changed to a 66 for the home team to make it a missed call, so almost every time that happens the visiting team was robbed. HOWEVER, when I looked twice at the card, I realized it was not a missed call because Delle Donne is one of the few players in the game for whom a 36 roll is NOT a foul. Players who foul a lot foul on 33-36, an average player fouls on 35-36, and a player who rarely fouls might only foul on a 36. But then there are a few like Delle Donne who don't foul on their own card. Parker's three fouls drawn were the one that each player starts with when the game is 20-20 at the outset of a Value Add Basketball Game and two on her own card, where she gets the ball a ton (a 4, 7 or 8 on the 1-8 roll) and then drew fouls on Delle Donne with 20-sided die rolls in the 10-12 range.

Two possessions after Delle Donne avoided the fourth foul, Parker committed her fifth foul and Delle Donne made both free throws. She is 90 percent from the line, with 1-18 made and 19-20 a miss. While most wouldn't care about that, if we imagine gamblers in the small arena who took Tennessee giving 25 points, the fact that Delle Donne had just made the score 57-34 while fouling out one of the 10 greatest players in the history of college basketball would have been intriguing.

In fact, the Vols are one of the few teams in men's or women's history that could have a future pro player foul out and simply bring in another one. In their case, future WNBA player Alberta Auguste came off the bench, and the Vols immediately went on a 12-0 run after Parker fouled out to make it 69-34 — a 35-point lead against a 25-point spread — and went on to win 76-42 to easily cover.

The dominance leads to one other note: If anyone plays Value Add Basketball without using the "dunk" chart, then you really aren't playing the game right. A game like this would heavily favor the mid-major school that built its stats against much lighter competition than the SEC powerhouse in this case. Tennessee's LAYUP range on that chart for this game was 51-54, meaning any roll in that range on the 11-66 roll guarantees they at least get a layup unless they decide to take the result of the 20-sided die — a 3-pointer or drawing a foul on a crucial opposing player. The Vols chose that option once to get the third foul on Delle Donne rather than take the layup and leave her at two fouls.

But more importantly, the chart for Delaware shows that 51-64 is always a stop — meaning the Vols get the ball without letting Delaware score, whether that comes from a miss and defensive rebound or a turnover. Both figures are crucial because they adjust for the Blue Hens playing much lighter competition to build up stats that might look better than an SEC school's on paper until you realize the SEC school compiled its numbers against much better competition.

With the 6'4" Parker sitting out the last 21 possessions, Delle Donne almost caught her in points, 10 to 11, going 8-for-8 from the line but never getting a true bucket after the automatic two points while playing against five excellent defensive future WNBA players. The 6'5" Delle Donne did finally pass Parker in rebounds, 10-9, and had a steal and the only true block for either team in the whole game, though we automatically give both starting centers one block for the opening minutes that make the score 20-20 before we roll our first dice.

So for us, even though the gamblers who went with the favorite in this one would have cruised to victory, there was a lot of fun imagining this game in a small gym, with a visiting team that we believe was one of the three best teams of all time traveling to the tiny state to play there.


 
Pos     Tennessee 2007          Pts  3pt 2pt  FTAtt  Reb Stl  Blk  Fl  Ht
1-PGShannon Bobbitt7120031025'2
2-SGAlexis Hornbuckle10220021015'11
3-SFSidney Spencer17340040016'3
4-PFCandace Parker11043490056'4
5-CNicky Anosike15071262116'4
PosReservePts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt
1-PGCait McMahan2010020025'4
2-SGAlberta Auguste4020010015'11
3-SFDominique Redding2010010016'1
4-PFNicci Moats2010010016'2
5-CAlex Fuller6022352016'3
  7662769346116 
            
PosDelaware 2013Pts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt
1-PGKayla Miller6030021015'10
2-SGAkeema Richards6030011015'7
3-SFLauren Carra2010050025'9
4-PFElena Delle Donne100188101146'5
5-CDanielle Parker40200101116'2
PosReservePts3pt2ptFTAttRebStlBlkFlHt
1-PGTrumae Lucas4012320015'8
2-SGChelsea Craig2010010016'2
3-SFJaquetta May4020030015'9
4-PFKelsey Buchanan2010010016'3
5-CStephanie Leon2010010016'3
  420171011364214

And here is each player's actual stats from the season on which the set of cards is calculated.

 
Pos        Tennessee 2007              Ht     Season Stats                                 
1-PGShannon Bobbitt5'28.7 Pts, 1.6 Reb, 2.7 Ast,WNBA
2-SGAlexis Hornbuckle5'1110.2 Pts, 5.1 Reb, 3.9 Ast,WNBA
3-SFSidney Spencer6'311.6 Pts, 4.2 Reb, 1.1 Ast,WNBA
4-PFCandace Parker6'419.6 Pts, 9.8 Reb, 2.4 Ast,WNBA
5-CNicky Anosike6'47.5 Pts, 6.2 Reb, 1.6 Ast,WNBA
1-PGCait McMahan5'42.4 Pts, 1.2 Reb, 1.3 Ast
2-SGAlberta Auguste5'115.0 Pts, 2.3 Reb, 1.4 Ast, WNBA
3-SFDominique Redding6'13.5 Pts, 1.4 Reb, 0.2 Ast
4-PFNicci Moats6'20.9 Pts, 1.0 Reb, 0.0 Ast
5-CAlex Fuller6'36.0 Pts, 4.1 Reb, 0.9 Ast
    
PosDelaware 2013HtSeason Stats
1-PGKayla Miller5'103.7 Pts, 1.3 Reb, 3.0 Ast
2-SGAkeema Richards5'75.5 Pts, 2.6 Reb, 1.1 Ast
3-SFLauren Carra5'910.7 Pts, 5.7 Reb, 2.0 Ast
4-PFlena Delle Donne6'526.0 Pts, 8.5 Reb, 1.9 Ast,WNBA
5-CDanielle Parker6'28.8 Pts, 8.7 Reb, 0.9 Ast
1-PGTrumae Lucas5'86.6 Pts, 2.5 Reb, 2.6 Ast
2-SGChelsea Craig6'20.4 Pts, 0.8 Reb, 0.2 Ast
3-SFJaquetta May5'94.8 Pts, 4.4 Reb, 0.8 Ast
4-PFKelsey Buchanan6'32.1 Pts, 2.1 Reb, 0.2 Ast
5-CStephanie Leon6'30.7 Pts, 1.7 Reb, 0.0 Ast


Here are photos of the score sheet and player cards





Thursday, November 23, 2023

Colonial Athletic Conference and Return of Value Add Rankings

All-Colonial Athletic Association    Team                     ValueAdjOAdjDNotes
Ben BurnhamCharleston7.30118.898.712-seed, 31-4, Poss 21.4%
Pat RobinsonCharleston6.7511498.712-seed, 31-4, Poss 24.5%
Luke HouseDrexel6.50127.8102.817-15, Poss 14%
Ante BrzovicCharleston6.18109.798.712-seed, 31-4, Poss 28.9%
Dalton BolonCharleston6.12111.798.712-seed, 31-4, Poss 24%
HM-Colonial Athletic AssociationTeamValueAdjOAdjDNotes
Maleeck Harden-HayesUNC Wilmington5.89118101.224-10, Poss 17.2%
Charles ThompsonTowson5.66116.7104.421-12, Poss 21.6%
Aaron EstradaHofstra4.49107.5102.425-10, Poss 29.2%
Jameer Nelson Jr.Delaware3.89105.8107.717-16 (PG), Poss 32.2%

Above is a very late All-Colonial Athletic Conference team from the 2022-23 season, and we will be updating these and the top 300 players at www.valueaddbasketball.com to go along with the rankings going back to the 2001-02 season. While this system received rave reviews from Sports Illustrated, ESPN, Fox Sports and many others, last season we skipped because we lost the ability to rank all 4000 players who take the court for D1 action.

The Jameer Nelson Jr. listed is in fact the son of the very famous Jameer Nelson, and had transferred from Delaware to TCU after the season.

The only realignment this year is Campbell joining the CAA. While the conference has not produced a March Madness upset bid since Charleston let an upset slip away late against Auburn in 2018, it is one of the most balanced conferences with a half dozen solid teams that all seem to have a shot at the title.

Team                              2023  2024    2025    Seed23   Rnk24
CampbellBSthCAACAA 317
CharlestonCAACAACAA12158
DelawareCAACAACAA 141
DrexelCAACAACAA 134
ElonCAACAACAA 296
HamptonCAACAACAA 309
HofstraCAACAACAA 114
MonmouthCAACAACAA 254
North Carolina A&TCAACAACAA 358
NortheasternCAACAACAA 211
Stony BrookCAACAACAA 282
TowsonCAACAACAA 191
UNC WilmingtonCAACAACAA 163
William & MaryCAACAACAA 301

Better late than never - this is one of 32 lists of All-Conference teams based on the "resurrected" Value Add Basketball rankings at www.valueaddbasketball.com. The other 31 releases of Conference teams will all include this same explanation for the rest of the blog, including the 10 returning All-Americans and top 60 players from last season listed further down.

This paragraph is of interest to stat nerds only. The offensive ratings were easier to recreate, since the basis was to pull hundreds of players ranked as the most efficient last season (AdjO at www.kenpom.com) and adjusting their figures for their percent of possessions. A player who can produce about 1.2 points per time he has the ball who also gets the ball 25% of the time against tough competition and as part of a strong defense can be All-American level, but a player who doesn't get the ball nearly as often but produces even more at 1.3 points per possession can still be All-Conference even if fans feel other players handling and shooting the ball more are better due to higher points scored per game.

The new simplified system weighs their ability to produce points against the Adjusted Defense (AdjD) - that is how many points per 100 trips would their team allow against an average D1 team. This accounts both for defense and for level of competition. We also note if a player is a Point Guard, the most important position on the court.

The resulting "Value" listed in the third column is the Value Add of points the player would improve an average team over if he could not play if a decent replacement took his place. Zach Edey was by far the most valuable player in the country last year at 13.17 meaning typically he would turn a 65-70 loss for a team into a 72-64 win - a 13 point swing. The notes off to the first indicated the team's record, their seed if they made the tournament, and then if they went to the NBA in the 2023 draft or are projected to go in the 2024 or 2025 draft.

1st and 2nd Team Returning All-Americans; and Top 60 Players from Last Season
 
The table below is the list of the 30 most valuable players in college basketball for the 2022-23 season according to our simplified www.valueaddbasketball.com rankings. Obviously most of these top players finished their eligibility or went pro so are no longer playing. However, if we made this our All-American teams of returning players including transfers at their new school the headline would be from Creighton.

1st Team Returning All-Americans - Value Add Basketball calculates that Creighton now has two of the three most valuable players in 2022-23 in returning Ryan Kalkbrenner and Utah State transfer Steven Ashworth. Ironically, Thursday it was Colorado State that handed Creighton its first loss - a team that Ashworth had dominated four of seven times in conference games at Utah State. The other 1st Team All-Americans based on last year's Value Add would be J'Wan Roberts returning for Houston, and then Tylor Perry who transferred from North Texas to Kansas State.

Most Valuable Player for 2nd Year. However, the far and away Most Valuable Player in the Country could challenge Anthony Davis, Jon Scheyer and Zion Williamson for as the most Valuable college player of the century in the All-Time Value Add Basketball Rankings - Zach Edey who was almost 2 points better than anyone in the country last year at Purdue and has them at No. 1 this season.

2nd Team Returning All-Americans - The 6th most valuable returning player according to Value Add is Marquette Point Guard Tyler Kolek. He would be joined on a second team All-American squad of returning players by Tennessee's Santiago Vescovi, Texas transfer from Oral Roberts Max Abmas, Duke's Ryan Young, Arizona's Azuolas Tubelis and finally Cam Spencer, who transferred from Rutgers to UConn.

In all, 18 of the top 30 players finished their college careers, leaving those 10 returning All-Americans and then two other players - JaKobe Coles of TCU and USC's Boogie Ellis.
 
All-American 1st Team    Team               Value    AdjO  AdjDNotes                                                
Zach EdeyPurdue13.17125.994.51-seed, 29-6, nba 58 in 2024
Adama Sanogo (gone)Connecticut11.37122.690.94-seed, 31-8, Poss 26.4%
Marcus Sasser (gone)Houston11.25123.490.41-seed, 33-4, nba 25 in 2023
Ryan KalkbrennerCreighton10.80133.493.26-seed, 24-13, Poss 19.4%
Steven Ashworth (Creigh)Utah St.10.72127.798.910-seed, 26-9 (PG), Poss 21.6%
All-American 2nd TeamTeamValueAdjOAdjDNotes
Tylor Perry (K-State)North Texas10.37124.394.131-7, Poss 24.4%
Brandon Miller (gone)Alabama10.23117.088.21-seed, 31-6, nba 2 in 2023
Xavier Castaneda (gone)Akron9.94121.9103.422-11 (PG), Poss 29.4%
J'Wan RobertsHouston9.90127.990.41-seed, 33-4, Poss 18.4%
Jordan Hawkins (gone)Connecticut9.88121.290.94-seed, 31-8, nba 14 in 2023
All-American 3rd TeamTeamValueAdjOAdjDNotes
Jaime Jaquez (gone)UCLA9.80113.1882-seed, 31-6, nba 18 in 2023
Jalen Pickett (gone)Penn St.9.66118.7101.110-seed, 23-14 (PG), nba 32 in 2023
Jordan Walker (gone)UAB9.64114.797.929-10 (PG), Poss 30.6%
Tyler KolekMarquette9.6311896.72-seed, 29-7 (PG), Poss 24.1%
Santiago VescoviTennessee9.52114.287.54-seed, 25-11 (PG), Poss 18.8%
All-American 4th TeamTeamValueAdjOAdjDNotes
Max Abmas (Texas)Oral Roberts9.47120.2102.212-seed, 30-5 (PG), Poss 27.6%
Trayce Jackson-Davis (g)Indiana9.45118.597.24-seed, 23-12, nba 57 in 2023
Ryan YoungDuke9.37128.793.95-seed, 27-9, Poss 18.3%
Kendric Davis (grad)Memphis9.24111.196.18-seed, 26-9 (PG), Poss 31.6%
Drew Timme (grad)Gonzaga9.21119.699.33-seed, 31-6, Poss 30.6%
All-American 5th TeamTeamValueAdjOAdjDNotes
Markquis Nowell (gone)Kansas St.8.92111953-seed, 26-10 (PG), Poss 27.6%
Souley Boum (gone)Xavier8.87119.298.63-seed, 27-10 (PG), Poss 21.2%
Oscar Tshiebwe (gone)Kentucky8.83122.698.86-seed, 22-12, Poss 24.5%
Terence Lewis (gone)Louisiana8.74131.2102.913-seed, 26-8, Poss 20.3%
Darius McGhee (gone)Liberty8.68114.597.527-9, Poss 33.4%
All-American 6th TeamTeamValueAdjOAdjDNotes
Azuolas TubelisArizona8.68116.196.32-seed, 28-7, Poss 28.7%
Cam Spencer (UConn)Rutgers8.66119.490.819-15, Poss 19.8%
Sir'Jabari Rice (gone)Texas8.66116.392.12-seed, 29-9, Poss 23.4%
JaKobe ColesTCU8.64118.494.36-seed, 22-13, Poss 23.4%
Boogie EllisUSC8.56113.397.510-seed, 22-11 (PG), Poss 25.7%