1st Ever Undefeated Women's Champ Texas 1986 That Beat Cheryl Miller in Her Last Game Ever

You can watch the first-ever undefeated women’s national champion, the 1986 Texas Longhorns, in this video, ending Cheryl Miller’s chance at a third national championship in decisive 97–81 fashion.

It was the last game Miller ever played. The knee injury that would ultimately keep her from ever playing professionally held her to 2-of-11 shooting in the championship game.

Clarissa Davis-Wrightsil came off the bench to score 24 points and grab 14 rebounds in just 24 minutes. She went on to become National Player of the Year during her college career and is ranked as our 40th-greatest college player ever, despite playing only one season professionally—ironically under coach Cheryl Miller, who we ranked as the 9th greatest woman's college basketball team of all time.

In this game, Texas was traveling to Purdue 2003 in the Value Add Basketball Game, trying to maintain its all-time ranking as the fourth-greatest team of all time. Here is the box score, as the Longhorns easily won at Purdue, 76–52, in the Value Add Basketball Game.

The 1986 Texas team was not included at first because we did not have enough stats until a couple of years later. Originally, we only had enough stats for Clarissa Davis-Wrightsil’s senior year, when she made our all-time top 40 players list, but that Texas team was actually not very good. That team was later replaced in the game by the undefeated 1986 national championship team.

Purdue 2003 is likewise a strong team, BUT we didn’t have enough stats for any of Purdue’s championship teams from previous decades—so this is likely a bit of a mismatch when we roll the first dice.

In this game, Davis came off the bench as a freshman to score a game-high 20 points.

Pos	Texas 1986	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht	Season stats
1-PG	Kamie Ethridge	6	0	3	0	0	2	4	0	2	5'5	5.2 Pts, 2.6 Reb, 6.1 Ast
2-SG	Beverly Williams	11	1	4	0	0	5	1	0	1	5'8	11.6 Pts, 4.1 Reb, 3.0 Ast,wnba
3-SF	Fran Harris	12	0	6	0	0	4	0	0	4	6'0	13.8 Pts, 3.6 Reb, 1.5 Ast
4-PF	Andrea Lloyd-Curry	9	0	3	3	5	7	0	0	4	6'2	9.2 Pts, 7.5 Reb, 2.6 Ast,wnba
5-C	Annette Smith	8	0	4	0	0	5	0	1	2	5'11	10.4 Pts, 4.1 Reb, 0.9 Ast
Pos	Reserve	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht	Season stats
1-PG	Audrey Smith	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	5'7	3.8 Pts, 1.2 Reb, 1.5 Ast
2-SG	Yulonda Wimbish	4	0	2	0	0	1	0	0	1	5'9	7.4 Pts, 1.7 Reb, 0.5 Ast
3-SF	Gay Hemphill	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	5'11	7.2 Pts, 3.2 Reb, 0.7 Ast
4-PF	Clarissa Davis-Wrightsil	20	2	7	0	0	5	0	0	2	6'3	13.5 Pts, 7.7 Reb, 0.5 Ast,wnba
5-C	Cara Priddy	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'2	4.9 Pts, 2.1 Reb, 0.2 Ast
		76	3	32	3	5	32	5	1	19
Pos	purdue 2003	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht	Season stats
1-PG	Erika Valek	11	1	3	2	2	2	3	1	1	5'6	14.0 Pts, 3.8 Reb, 4.9 Ast
2-SG	Beth Jones	2	0	1	0	0	2	3	0	1	5'9	8.7 Pts, 2.4 Reb, 2.5 Ast
3-SF	Lindsey Hicks	10	0	4	2	4	4	0	0	1	6'1	7.4 Pts, 4.4 Reb, 1.7 Ast
4-PF	Shereka Wright	14	0	5	4	6	4	1	0	3	5'10	18.9 Pts, 6.3 Reb, 2.7 Ast,wnba
5-C	Mary Jo Noon	5	0	2	1	2	8	0	1	1	6'5	11.0 Pts, 4.9 Reb, 0.6 Ast
Pos	Reserve	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht	Season stats
1-PG	Sharika Webb	2	0	1	0	0	1	1	0	1	5'9	2.8 Pts, 1.8 Reb, 1.4 Ast
2-SG	Carol Duncan	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'1	1.9 Pts, 2.1 Reb, 0.2 Ast
3-SF	Missy Taylor	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'3	1.7 Pts, 1.4 Reb, 0.3 Ast
4-PF	Sabrina Keys	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'3	1.3 Pts, 1.1 Reb, 0.1 Ast
5-C	Emily Heikes	2	0	1	0	0	3	0	0	2	6'0	6.0 Pts, 5.3 Reb, 0.4 Ast
		52	1	20	9	14	27	8	2	13

Taurasi & Bird Lead 2002 UConn to No. 1 All-Time with 94-45 Trashing at UVa

 The greatest professional woman's player of all time Diana Taurasi her six fellow future WNBA players inclding four of the top six picks that year led the 2002 UConn team to a 94-45 demolition of the 2018 UVa team in Charlottesville. 

In our all-time rankings, which are almost the same as www.kenpom.com expect we reward 3 extra points to the winning team and cap the "perfect" Game Score at +25, UConn 2002 passes Pat Summitt's 1998 Tennessee team as the top college women's team of all time.

Here is our new all-time Top 10 teams with their rating to the far right - these three teams are all at least four points better than the next best team so far.

 

Rank	Team	Year	Before	New Tournament Result	W	L	Rate
1	Connecticut	2002	15.5	won at 2018 UVa 94-45 (GS +25)	2	0	17.4
2	Tennessee	1998	18.4	won at 2009 Auburn 69-52 (GS +9)	5	0	17.2
3	Tennessee	2007	14.7	won at 2013 Delaware 76-42 (GS +25)	2	0	16.8
4	Texas	1986		at 2003 Purdue, needs 29pt win for +25	1	0	12.5
5	Louisiana Tech	1982		at 2012 Penn St, needs 21pt win for +25	3	1	12.4
6	South Carolina	2024		at 2021 AZ, needs 30pt win for +25	1	0	12
7	Connecticut	2016		at 2005 LSU, needs 28pt win for +25	1	1	10.8
7	Connecticut	1995		at 2012 Stanford, needs 24pt win for +25	1	0	10.8
9	Notre Dame	2018		at 2007 UNC, needs 23pt win for +25	3	1	9.9
10	Connecticut	2010		at Long Beach St, needs 22pt win for +25	2	1	9.3

Coming into this new 64-team tournament, the 1998 Vols were 4-0 and had a rating of +18.4, meaning we calculated the would beat teh average team in the game by 18.4 points. However, they got a scare traveling to play 2009 Auburn team and teh 69-52 win fell well short of expectations and lowered their new rating to 17.2. 

The 2007 Tennessee team won more impressively with a 76-42 win over Delaware to improve from 14.7 to just below the other two teams at 16.8, just 0.6 points behind the 1998 Vols.

 

But UConn 2002, which is the team to ever put seven future WNBA playres on the roster besides the 2016 UConn team (which had eight) then rolled into Charlottesville and scored on their first seven possessions and went from the starting 20-20 score to 35-22 and never looked back. Here are the stats.

 

Pos	UConn 2002	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht	Season stats
1-PG	Sue Bird	21	3	4	4	4	2	2	0	3	5'9	14.4 Pts, 3.4 Reb, 5.9 Ast, WNBA
2-SG	Swin Cash	17	0	6	5	6	7	2	1	2	6'2	14.9 Pts, 8.6 Reb, 2.2 Ast, WNBA
3-SF	Diana Taurasi	19	1	8	0	0	3	1	0	1	6'0	14.5 Pts, 4.1 Reb, 5.3 Ast, WNBA
4-PF	Asjha Jones	5	0	2	1	2	9	1	0	2	6'2	14.0 Pts, 6.6 Reb, 1.7 Ast, WNBA
5-C	Tamika Williams	9	0	4	1	1	5	1	2	1	6'2	10.1 Pts, 6.9 Reb, 1.3 Ast, WNBA
Pos	Reserve	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht	Season stats
1-PG	Maria Conlon	8	0	2	4	6	1	0	0	3	5'9	4.1 Pts, 2.0 Reb, 1.8 Ast
2-SG	Ashley Valley	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	5'9	2.9 Pts, 1.7 Reb, 1.1 Ast
3-SF	Morgan Valley	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'0	3.6 Pts, 2.6 Reb, 0.9 Ast
4-PF	Ashley Battle	6	0	2	2	2	5	1	0	1	6'0	5.4 Pts, 4.7 Reb, 1.3 Ast, WNBA
5-C	Jessica Moore	5	0	2	1	4	5	0	0	1	6'3	5.4 Pts, 3.9 Reb, 0.8 Ast, WNBA
		94	4	32	18	25	39	8	3	16
Pos	Virginia 2018	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht	Season stats
1-PG	J'Kyra Brown	8	0	2	4	4	2	1	0	4	5'11	9.5 Pts, 3.5 Reb, 2.4 Ast
2-SG	Dominique Toussaint	4	0	1	2	2	2	1	0	5	5'9	11.4 Pts, 3.5 Reb, 3.7 Ast
3-SF	Aliyah Huland El	7	1	2	0	0	4	0	0	1	6'1	10.1 Pts, 3.2 Reb, 1.4 Ast
4-PF	Jocelyn Willoughby	6	0	2	2	2	6	1	1	2	6'0	9.6 Pts, 5.4 Reb, 1.0 Ast, WNBA
5-C	Felicia Aiyeotan	2	0	1	0	0	3	0	3	1	6'9	7.4 Pts, 6.9 Reb, 0.7 Ast
Pos	Reserve	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht	Season stats
1-PG	Brianna Tinsley	10	0	3	4	4	2	0	0	3	5'7	4.1 Pts, 1.7 Reb, 1.5 Ast
2-SG	Khyasia Caldwell	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	5'5	0.9 Pts, 0.1 Reb, 0.1 Ast
3-SF	Mone Jones	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'3	0.5 Pts, 0.4 Reb, 0.4 Ast
4-PF	Lauren Moses	2	0	1	0	0	4	1	0	4	6'2	7.2 Pts, 4.8 Reb, 0.9 Ast
5-C	Lisa Jablonowski	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'3	2.3 Pts, 2.9 Reb, 1.2 Ast
		45	1	15	12	12	26	4	4	23

Here are the scoresheets at the beginning and end of the campaign.

Epic Candace Parker vs. Elena Delle Donne Clash While Vols Rout Delaware 76-42

Epic Candace Parker vs. Elena Delle Donne

While this game was a blowout from the beginning, as the Tennessee 2007 team, ranked No. 3 all-time in our rankings, easily covered the 25-point spread despite traveling to Delaware, it was fun to imagine this Value Add Basketball Game despite the 76-42 final score. The 2007 season was the first of Pat Summitt's final two national titles, which happened in back-to-back seasons. And after our No. 1-ranked Vols team from a decade earlier came nowhere near covering its spread, it does raise the question of whether this could be the top women's team of all time or if that distinction belongs to one of the UConn teams.

The first fun part of imagining this game is imagining a trip by Pat Summitt and the Vols into a mid-major arena that usually draws about 1,200 fans for mid-major games, compared to the 15,000+ who come out for UConn and Tennessee games. Only once did Delaware draw more than 5,000 fans, and that was when they got a top-10 Maryland team to drive 60 miles to play while Delle Donne was there, and the Terps beat them by double digits. So this game would never happen, and that's why it's fun to imagine it in a Value Add Basketball Game.

The next item is the matchup of the two players we play at the 4 (power forward): Elena Delle Donne, who we rank as the 12th-greatest college player in history, and, of course, Tennessee's Candace Parker, who we rank as the 10th-greatest college player in our all-time top 40. Even as the five future WNBA players on the court for Tennessee dominated the four non-WNBA starters for mid-major Delaware, the Parker vs. Delle Donne matchup was epic. Both drew three first-half fouls on each other, while Parker had the 11-point, 7-rebound advantage over Delle Donne's 6 points and 2 rebounds.

Then in the second half, the tables turned with what looked like a little home cooking. In the first apparent bad call of the game, Parker drove to the hoop and scored to make it 53-32 Vols, BUT Delle Donne appeared to foul her, so it should have been an and-one and a fourth foul on Delle Donne. A 36 roll on defense can be changed to a 66 for the home team to make it a missed call, so almost every time that happens the visiting team was robbed. HOWEVER, when I looked twice at the card, I realized it was not a missed call because Delle Donne is one of the few players in the game for whom a 36 roll is NOT a foul. Players who foul a lot foul on 33-36, an average player fouls on 35-36, and a player who rarely fouls might only foul on a 36. But then there are a few like Delle Donne who don't foul on their own card. Parker's three fouls drawn were the one that each player starts with when the game is 20-20 at the outset of a Value Add Basketball Game and two on her own card, where she gets the ball a ton (a 4, 7 or 8 on the 1-8 roll) and then drew fouls on Delle Donne with 20-sided die rolls in the 10-12 range.

Two possessions after Delle Donne avoided the fourth foul, Parker committed her fifth foul and Delle Donne made both free throws. She is 90 percent from the line, with 1-18 made and 19-20 a miss. While most wouldn't care about that, if we imagine gamblers in the small arena who took Tennessee giving 25 points, the fact that Delle Donne had just made the score 57-34 while fouling out one of the 10 greatest players in the history of college basketball would have been intriguing.

In fact, the Vols are one of the few teams in men's or women's history that could have a future pro player foul out and simply bring in another one. In their case, future WNBA player Alberta Auguste came off the bench, and the Vols immediately went on a 12-0 run after Parker fouled out to make it 69-34 — a 35-point lead against a 25-point spread — and went on to win 76-42 to easily cover.

The dominance leads to one other note: If anyone plays Value Add Basketball without using the "dunk" chart, then you really aren't playing the game right. A game like this would heavily favor the mid-major school that built its stats against much lighter competition than the SEC powerhouse in this case. Tennessee's LAYUP range on that chart for this game was 51-54, meaning any roll in that range on the 11-66 roll guarantees they at least get a layup unless they decide to take the result of the 20-sided die — a 3-pointer or drawing a foul on a crucial opposing player. The Vols chose that option once to get the third foul on Delle Donne rather than take the layup and leave her at two fouls.

But more importantly, the chart for Delaware shows that 51-64 is always a stop — meaning the Vols get the ball without letting Delaware score, whether that comes from a miss and defensive rebound or a turnover. Both figures are crucial because they adjust for the Blue Hens playing much lighter competition to build up stats that might look better than an SEC school's on paper until you realize the SEC school compiled its numbers against much better competition.

With the 6'4" Parker sitting out the last 21 possessions, Delle Donne almost caught her in points, 10 to 11, going 8-for-8 from the line but never getting a true bucket after the automatic two points while playing against five excellent defensive future WNBA players. The 6'5" Delle Donne did finally pass Parker in rebounds, 10-9, and had a steal and the only true block for either team in the whole game, though we automatically give both starting centers one block for the opening minutes that make the score 20-20 before we roll our first dice.

So for us, even though the gamblers who went with the favorite in this one would have cruised to victory, there was a lot of fun imagining this game in a small gym, with a visiting team that we believe was one of the three best teams of all time traveling to the tiny state to play there.

 

Pos	Tennessee 2007	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht
1-PG	Shannon Bobbitt	7	1	2	0	0	3	1	0	2	5'2
2-SG	Alexis Hornbuckle	10	2	2	0	0	2	1	0	1	5'11
3-SF	Sidney Spencer	17	3	4	0	0	4	0	0	1	6'3
4-PF	Candace Parker	11	0	4	3	4	9	0	0	5	6'4
5-C	Nicky Anosike	15	0	7	1	2	6	2	1	1	6'4
Pos	Reserve	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht
1-PG	Cait McMahan	2	0	1	0	0	2	0	0	2	5'4
2-SG	Alberta Auguste	4	0	2	0	0	1	0	0	1	5'11
3-SF	Dominique Redding	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'1
4-PF	Nicci Moats	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'2
5-C	Alex Fuller	6	0	2	2	3	5	2	0	1	6'3
		76	6	27	6	9	34	6	1	16
Pos	Delaware 2013	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht
1-PG	Kayla Miller	6	0	3	0	0	2	1	0	1	5'10
2-SG	Akeema Richards	6	0	3	0	0	1	1	0	1	5'7
3-SF	Lauren Carra	2	0	1	0	0	5	0	0	2	5'9
4-PF	Elena Delle Donne	10	0	1	8	8	10	1	1	4	6'5
5-C	Danielle Parker	4	0	2	0	0	10	1	1	1	6'2
Pos	Reserve	Pts	3pt	2pt	FT	Att	Reb	Stl	Blk	Fl	Ht
1-PG	Trumae Lucas	4	0	1	2	3	2	0	0	1	5'8
2-SG	Chelsea Craig	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'2
3-SF	Jaquetta May	4	0	2	0	0	3	0	0	1	5'9
4-PF	Kelsey Buchanan	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'3
5-C	Stephanie Leon	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	6'3
		42	0	17	10	11	36	4	2	14

And here is each player's actual stats from the season on which the set of cards is calculated.

 

Pos	Tennessee 2007	Ht	Season Stats
1-PG	Shannon Bobbitt	5'2	8.7 Pts, 1.6 Reb, 2.7 Ast,WNBA
2-SG	Alexis Hornbuckle	5'11	10.2 Pts, 5.1 Reb, 3.9 Ast,WNBA
3-SF	Sidney Spencer	6'3	11.6 Pts, 4.2 Reb, 1.1 Ast,WNBA
4-PF	Candace Parker	6'4	19.6 Pts, 9.8 Reb, 2.4 Ast,WNBA
5-C	Nicky Anosike	6'4	7.5 Pts, 6.2 Reb, 1.6 Ast,WNBA
1-PG	Cait McMahan	5'4	2.4 Pts, 1.2 Reb, 1.3 Ast
2-SG	Alberta Auguste	5'11	5.0 Pts, 2.3 Reb, 1.4 Ast, WNBA
3-SF	Dominique Redding	6'1	3.5 Pts, 1.4 Reb, 0.2 Ast
4-PF	Nicci Moats	6'2	0.9 Pts, 1.0 Reb, 0.0 Ast
5-C	Alex Fuller	6'3	6.0 Pts, 4.1 Reb, 0.9 Ast
Pos	Delaware 2013	Ht	Season Stats
1-PG	Kayla Miller	5'10	3.7 Pts, 1.3 Reb, 3.0 Ast
2-SG	Akeema Richards	5'7	5.5 Pts, 2.6 Reb, 1.1 Ast
3-SF	Lauren Carra	5'9	10.7 Pts, 5.7 Reb, 2.0 Ast
4-PF	lena Delle Donne	6'5	26.0 Pts, 8.5 Reb, 1.9 Ast,WNBA
5-C	Danielle Parker	6'2	8.8 Pts, 8.7 Reb, 0.9 Ast
1-PG	Trumae Lucas	5'8	6.6 Pts, 2.5 Reb, 2.6 Ast
2-SG	Chelsea Craig	6'2	0.4 Pts, 0.8 Reb, 0.2 Ast
3-SF	Jaquetta May	5'9	4.8 Pts, 4.4 Reb, 0.8 Ast
4-PF	Kelsey Buchanan	6'3	2.1 Pts, 2.1 Reb, 0.2 Ast
5-C	Stephanie Leon	6'3	0.7 Pts, 1.7 Reb, 0.0 Ast

Here are photos of the score sheet and player cards

Auburn 2009 Gives All-Time Champs Tennessee 1998 a Scare Until Late Run

We tried a little twist to play off the 64 greatest all-time women's teams in the Value Add Basketball Game: the designated better seeds have to play on the road. We remembered UNC and Kentucky agreeing to play all road games in the NIT one year. That shift means our first game changed from the 34-point spread we posted to a 31-point spread due to the favorite needing to play on the road, but it was much closer than that.

In fact our all-time champions from Tennessee 1998 got quite a scare against Auburn 2009, a team that went 30-4 and defeated Tennessee 82-68 during that season.. An early home job call - which occurs when the home team changes a roll of 36 to 66 or vice versa - gave an early 2nd foul to Tamika Catchings, who we ranked as the greatest college women's basketball player of all time in this top 40.

Auburn hung right with the legendary 39-0 Tennessee team through the first half. The Tigers actually took a 26-25 lead before Tennessee recovered to lead just 30-28 at halftime.

Then the all-time champs finally took over.

For this game, we're trying something different with the play-by-play. Rather than just giving the final score and highlights, we're listing every dice roll except the 1-20 free-throw rolls, along with what happened on each possession. The running score is on the left, with Tennessee listed first and Auburn second.

That lets you see not only what happened, but exactly how the Value Add Basketball game produced it.

When the line starts with TN, that means Tennessee is rolling, and if AU, then Auburn is rolling.

The first number is the 8-sided die to see which player gets the ball. The second number is the two 6-sided dice roll of 11-66 to see if the defender steals, blocks a shot or fouls, or if the offensive player turns it over, or there is a team defensive breakdown for a layup or alternatively a stop. The third number is the 20-sided die, which is only used if nothing happens on the 11-66, to see if the player shoots or gets to the line.

Tennessee 1998 vs. Auburn 2009

Tennessee 1998: 39-0, the first of three straight national championship teams in our all-time tournament format.

Auburn 2009: 30-4, ranked No. 8 nationally after a season that included an 82-68 victory over Tennessee to start 20-0.

Players entering the game (in Value Add the game starts 20-20 with all players having scored 2 points and 7 minutes left in the first half and in most cases reserves finishing out their last minutes before the starters finish the majority of the game).

Tennessee: Laurie Milligan (2.0 PPG, 0.4 RPG, 1.3 APG); Brynae Laxton (1.2, 1.9, 0.2); Niya Butts (1.8, 1.1, 0.3); LaShonda Stephens (4.0, 3.4, 0.2); Teresa Geter (6.3, 4.8, 0.8).

Auburn: Whitney Boddie (11.2 PPG, 4.6 RPG, 7.9 APG); Morgan Jennings (2.4, 1.6, 1.1); Reneisha Hobbs (2.7, 1.7, 0.5); Parrisha Simmons (1.0, 2.7, 0.6); KeKe Carrier (4.7, 3.1, 0.4).

If you want to scroll down to see the traditional box score and final, it appears at the bottom of the blog.

Play-by-Play

By each player we show which team they are on and then their position (1 = pg, 2 = sg etc) and if that 1 to 5 number is listed twice it means they were the backup player at that position.

Score TN-AU| Team| 8-side| 6-sides| 20-side| Player| Result

—| AU| 5| 35| 16| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Again, almost any center would have fouled

—| —| —| 4| 6| Sherell Hobbs (AU-3)| Rebound

—| —| 4| 33| 14| Trevesha Jackson (AU-4)| Missed shot

—| —| —| —| —| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Rebound

—| TN| 6| 42| 5| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Foul

—| AU| 2| 43| 9| Kellie Harper (TN-2)| Turnover

41-33| AU| —| —| —| Alli Smalley (AU-2)| Makes 1 of 2 free throws

43-33| TN| 5| 52| 20| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| 52 falls in her layup range

—| AU| 2| 43| 19| Alli Smalley (AU-2)| Missed shot

—| —| —| 4| 1| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Rebound

43-35| AU| 4| 42| 7| Trevesha Jackson (AU-4)| Most players turn it over on 42, but Jackson has no turnovers on her card, so the 7 produces the shot

45-35| TN| 8| 52| 16| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Layup range again

—| AU| 3| 31| 6| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Great steal

—| TN| 1| 24| 20| Kristen Clement (TN-1)| Missed shot

—| —| —| 6| 3| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Rebound

—| AU| 8| 41| 12| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Foul

—| TN| 7| 63| 17| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Missed shot

—| —| —| —| —| Trevesha Jackson (AU-4)| Rebound

45-37| AU| 8| 14| 8| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Basket

—| TN| 5| 42| 7| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Foul

—| AU| 5| 16| 2| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Unheard-of steal range of 1-6 for a center

48-37| TN| 6| 34| 3| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| 3-pointer

—| AU| 3| 36| 15| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Third foul on Catchings — danger

48-38| AU| —| —| —| Sherell Hobbs (AU-3)| Makes only the second of two free throws

50-38| TN| 8| 23| 2| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Basket

—| AU| 5| 22| 7| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Block — would otherwise have been a bucket

—| —| —| 4| 7| Trevesha Jackson (AU-4)| Offensive rebound — Jackson's excellent 1-7 range

—| —| 4| 32| 6| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Great steal saves a bucket

—| —| —| 6| 6| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Rebound

53-38| TN| 6| 26| 2| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| 3-pointer

—| AU| 4| 23| 12| Semeka Randall Lay (TN-4)| Blocked shot

—| —| —| —| —| Kellie Harper (TN-2)| Rebound

—| TN| 7| 55| 9| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Turnover

55-38| TN| —| —| —| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Makes both free throws

At that point, the scare was over. Tennessee had turned a 32-32 tie into a 55-38 lead, a 23-6 run that showed why this team is currently ranked 1st all-time in our game.

Closing Minutes

Score TN-AU| Team| 8-side| 6-sides| 20-side| Player| Result

—| AU| 5| 42| 13| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Foul

—| TN| 6| 44| 16| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Missed shot

—| —| —| —| —| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Rebound

—| AU| 5| 44| 17| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Missed shot

—| —| —| —| —| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Rebound

—| TN| 6| 64| 14| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Missed shot

—| —| —| 5| 9| Kristen Clement (TN-1)| Rebound

—| —| 4| 46| 14| Semeka Randall Lay (TN-4)| Missed shot

—| —| —| 2| 9| Whitney Boddie (AU-1)| Rebound

—| AU| 8| 42| 14| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Foul

—| TN| 5| 42| 14| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Foul

—| AU| 2| 22| 5| Kellie Harper (TN-2)| Blocked shot

—| —| —| 2| 16| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Rebound

—| TN| 2| 62| 13| Alli Smalley (AU-2)| Fourth foul

56-38| TN| —| —| —| Kellie Harper (TN-2)| Makes 1 of 2; 80% shooter has 1-16 FT range

—| AU| 6| 41| 17| Alli Smalley (AU-2)| Foul

58-38| TN| 1| 32| 8| Kristen Clement (TN-1)| Basket

58-40| AU| 1| 14| 6| Whitney Boddie (AU-1)| Basket

60-40| TN| 6| 53| 7| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Basket

—| AU| 8| 51| 7| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Missed shot

—| —| —| —| —| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Rebound

—| TN| 4| 55| 20| Semeka Randall Lay (TN-4)| Missed shot

—| —| —| —| —| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Rebound

—| AU| 5| 52| 5| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Missed shot

—| —| —| —| —| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Rebound

—| TN| 7| 32| 13| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Missed shot

—| —| —| 3| 11| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Rebound

60-42| AU| 2| 63| 7| Alli Smalley (AU-2)| Basket

62-42| TN| 1| 56| 7| Kristen Clement (TN-1)| Basket

62-44| AU| 1| 63| 1| Whitney Boddie (AU-1)| Basket

—| TN| 6| 12| 10| Sherell Hobbs (AU-3)| Only second foul on Hobbs

64-44| TN| —| —| —| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Makes both free throws — 85%, 1-17 FT range

—| AU| 2| 44| 9| Kellie Harper (TN-2)| Turnover

64-46| AU| —| —| —| Alli Smalley (AU-2)| Makes both free throws

—| TN| 5| 42| 16| Chamique Holdsclaw (TN-5)| Foul

—| AU| 6| 7| 32| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| Blocked shot

—| —| —| —| —| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Rebound

64-48| AU| 8| 25| 8| DeWanna Bonner (AU-5)| Basket

66-48| TN| 4| 25| 6| Semeka Randall Lay (TN-4)| Basket

66-50| AU| 1| 46| 5| Whitney Boddie (AU-1)| Basket

69-50| TN| 3| 46| 2| Tamika Catchings (TN-3)| 3-pointer

69-52| AU| 2| 43| 5| Alli Smalley (AU-2)| Basket

Final: Tennessee 1998 69, Auburn 2009 52

The final margin makes the game look much easier than it was.

Auburn led 28-25, trailed only 30-28 at halftime, and tied the game 32-32 early in the second half. From there, Tennessee's all-time talent took control.

The decisive stretch was a 23-6 Tennessee run, turning that 32-32 tie into a 55-38 advantage.

The experiment of forcing the designated home team onto the road also produced several interesting moments. Kellie Harper had rolls that could have resulted in additional foul calls at home, while Auburn benefited from the home-court adjustment on a key Tamika Catchings defensive roll.

But once Chamique Holdsclaw and Tamika Catchings started dominating both ends, Auburn's upset bid was finished.

For a while, though, the 2009 Tigers gave the 39-0 Tennessee national champions a much bigger scare than anyone would have expected.

And we saved it for the end - but here is the box score.

Bonner completely matched Tennessee leading scorer Chamique Holdsclaw, holding her to a 14-14 tie in scoring, only losing the rebounding edge 11-12, and barely losing the other three stats (1-2 in blocked shots, 5-3 in turnovers and 4 to 3 in steals).That is why the game was close into the 2nd half.

However, in the end there was once again no match for the player we rank as the greatest player ever to play college basketball, Tamika Catchings, who had a game-high 20 points and 3 blocked shots, with her 7 rebounds being the most of anyone except the two centers, and adding 2 steals. That was why the Vols pulled away for the 17 point win.

 

Pos	Starting Tennessee Vols (69)	Pts	Reb	Blocks	TO	Steal
1-PG	Kristen Clement	9	5	0	4	1
2-SG	Kellie Harper	5	2	1	5	1
3-SF	Tamika Catchings	20	7	3	3	2
4-PF	Semeka Randall Lay	6	3	1	0	0
5-C	Chamique Holdsclaw	14	12	2	3	4
Pos	Reserves	Pts	Reb	Blocks	TO	Steal
1-PG	Laurie Milligan	3	1	0	0	1
2-SG	Brynae Laxton	2	1	0	0	0
3-SF	Niya Butts	5	1	0	0	0
4-PF	LaShonda Stephens	3	1	0	0	0
5-C	Teresa Geter	2	3	2	1	0
Totals		69	36	9	16	9
Pos	Starting Auburn Tigers (52)	Pts	Reb	Blocks	TO	Steal
1-PG	Whitney Boddie	8	4	0	3	3
2-SG	Alli Smalley	11	2	0	6	2
3-SF	Sherell Hobbs	5	5	0	4	0
4-PF	Trevesha Jackson	4	4	1	1	0
5-C	DeWanna Bonner	14	11	1	5	3
Pos	Reserves	Pts	Reb	Blocks	TO	Steal
1-PG	Morgan Jennings	2	1	0	1	0
2-SG	Reneisha Hobbs	2	2	0	0	0
3-SF	Parrisha Simmons	2	1	0	0	0
4-PF	Chantel Hilliard	2	1	0	0	0
5-C	KeKe Carrier	2	1	0	1	0
Totals		52	32	2	21	8

64 All-Time Great Women’s Teams Tip Off Value Add Basketball Tournament

Rather than resume a minor tournament we had going when we switched from basketball to baseball six months ago, we remembered that we had purposely built the Value Add Basketball Game to exactly 64 all-time great women’s teams — the perfect number for a tournament with no byes.

To set the bracket, we used our current team ratings, which have been impacted by how each team has performed in our game so far. Our first tournament champion, the 1998 Tennessee team, is now No. 1 with an 18.4 rating, meaning we calculate that team to be 18.4 points better than the average great team in the game. At the other end is our No. 64 team, the 2009 Auburn team — admittedly a homer choice since my family had season tickets that year. We calculate that Auburn team to be 16 points worse than the average great team in the game.

These ratings appear on the team sheets you use to play the game. So we simply seeded No. 1 against No. 64, No. 2 against No. 63, and so on. As noted in the table below, that makes Pat Summitt’s all-time great 1998 Tennessee Vols a 34-point favorite over the 2009 Auburn team in our opening matchup.

Of course, the farther you go down the list, the more evenly matched the games become. The four teams in the middle are all within a point of each other, so the 2019 Marquette team is an even pick against the 1993 Ohio State team, while the 2024 Indiana team is even against the 1985 Old Dominion team.

So here are our next 32 women’s matchups. You can, of course, play your own free games using any of these teams by clicking here and printing out the one-sheet for each team.

And yes, Caitlin Clark’s 2024 Iowa team is a 10-point favorite against Sue Wicks and the 1988 Rutgers team. The cards for Clark and Michael Jordan appear on top of this blog showing how to play the free game.

Rnk	Team	Year	Leading Scorer	Record, average score & above ave. great
1	Tennessee	1998	Chamique Holdsclaw	4-0, Score/Allow: 76.3-64, Rating: 18.4
64	Auburn	2009	DeWanna Bonner	0-1, Score/Allow: 55-84, Rating: -16
				Tennessee 34 point favorite
2	Connecticut	2002	Swin Cash	1-0, Score/Allow: 75-46, Rating: 15.5
63	Virginia	2018	Dominique Toussaint	0-1, Score/Allow: 57-81, Rating: -15.2
				Connecticut 31 point favorite
3	Tennessee	2007	Candace Parker	1-0, Score/Allow: 89-70, Rating: 14.7
62	Delaware	2013	Elena Delle Donne	0-1, Score/Allow: 46-75, Rating: -13.5
				Tennessee 28 point favorite
4	Texas	1986	Fran Harris	1-0, Score/Allow: 76-66, Rating: 12.5
61	Purdue	2003	Shereka Wright	0-1, Score/Allow: 61-89, Rating: -12.8
				Texas 25 point favorite
5	Louisiana Tech	1982	Pam Kelly	3-1, Score/Allow: 76-67.5, Rating: 12.4
60	Penn State	2012	Maggie Lucas	0-1, Score/Allow: 64-84, Rating: -11.8
				Louisiana Tech 24 point favorite
6	South Carolina	2024	Kamilla Cardoso	1-0, Score/Allow: 84-55, Rating: 12
59	Arizona	2021	Aari McDonald	0-1, Score/Allow: 64-80, Rating: -9.3
				South Carolina 21 point favorite
7	Connecticut	1995	Rebecca Lobo	1-0, Score/Allow: 81-57, Rating: 10.8
58	Stanford	2012	Nneka Ogwumike	0-1, Score/Allow: 58-81, Rating: -9
				Connecticut 20 point favorite
8	Connecticut	2016	Breanna Stewart	1-1, Score/Allow: 80-64.5, Rating: 10.8
57	LSU	2005	Seimone Augustus	0-1, Score/Allow: 63-72, Rating: -8.2
				Connecticut 19 point favorite
9	Notre Dame	2018	Arike Ogunbowale	3-1, Score/Allow: 76.3-72.8, Rating: 9.9
56	North Carolina	2007	Ivory Latta	0-1, Score/Allow: 69-85, Rating: -8
				Notre Dame 18 point favorite
10	Connecticut	2010	Maya Moore	2-1, Score/Allow: 73.3-73.3, Rating: 9.3
55	Long Beach State	1987	Cindy Brown	0-1, Score/Allow: 53-98, Rating: -7.5
				Connecticut 17 point favorite
11	USC	1983	Cheryl Miller	2-1, Score/Allow: 72-63.3, Rating: 9.2
54	Ohio State	2016	Kelsey Mitchell	0-1, Score/Allow: 68-79, Rating: -7.3
				USC 17 point favorite
12	Old Dominion	1997	Clarisse Machanguana	1-0, Score/Allow: 85-69, Rating: 8.3
53	Minnesota	2004	Lindsay Whalen	0-1, Score/Allow: 72-76, Rating: -7.3
				Old Dominion 16 point favorite
13	Stanford	2021	Kiana Williams	1-1, Score/Allow: 79-72.5, Rating: 8.2
52	Texas	2018	Brooke McCarty	0-1, Score/Allow: 62-84, Rating: -6.5
				Stanford 15 point favorite
14	Louisiana Tech	1988	Erica Westbrooks	1-0, Score/Allow: 80-64, Rating: 7.2
51	USC	1994	Lisa Leslie	0-1, Score/Allow: 63-71, Rating: -6.3
				Louisiana Tech 14 point favorite
15	LSU	2023	Angel Reese	1-0, Score/Allow: 89-61, Rating: 6.8
50	Virginia Tech	2024	Elizabeth Kitley	0-1, Score/Allow: 76-80, Rating: -5
				LSU 12 point favorite
16	Baylor	2012	Brittney Griner	1-1, Score/Allow: 73.5-77, Rating: 6.2
49	Oklahoma	2002	Stacey Dales	0-1, Score/Allow: 79-85, Rating: -5
				Baylor 11 point favorite
17	Tennessee	1989	Bridgette Gordon	0-1, Score/Allow: 64-68, Rating: 6
48	Rutgers	2005	Cappie Pondexter	0-1, Score/Allow: 36-53, Rating: -4.2
				Tennessee 10 point favorite
18	Iowa	2024	Caitlin Clark	1-0, Score/Allow: 84-64, Rating: 5.8
47	Rutgers	1988	Sue Wicks	0-1, Score/Allow: 62-66, Rating: -4
				Iowa 10 point favorite
19	Auburn	1989	Vickie Orr	1-0, Score/Allow: 66-62, Rating: 5
46	Oklahoma	2010	Danielle Robinson	0-1, Score/Allow: 66-76, Rating: -3.5
				Auburn 9 point favorite
20	Notre Dame	2012	Skylar Diggins	0-1, Score/Allow: 70-78, Rating: 4
45	Georgia	2013	Jasmine Hassell	0-1, Score/Allow: 70-89, Rating: -3.3
				Notre Dame 7 point favorite
21	Michigan St.	2005	Liz Shimek	1-0, Score/Allow: 53-36, Rating: 3.8
44	Texas Tech	1993	Sheryl Swoopes	1-0, Score/Allow: 85-79, Rating: -3
				Michigan St. 7 point favorite
22	Baylor	2019	Kalani Brown	1-1, Score/Allow: 74-73, Rating: 3.6
43	Louisville	2014	Shoni Schimmel	0-1, Score/Allow: 69-76, Rating: -2.8
				Baylor 6 point favorite
23	Oregon	2019	Sabrina Ionescu	0-1, Score/Allow: 81-84, Rating: 3.5
42	NC State	2024	Aziaha James	0-1, Score/Allow: 72-78, Rating: -2.3
				Oregon 6 point favorite
24	Colorado St.	1999	Becky Hammon	1-0, Score/Allow: 81-58, Rating: 3
41	Washington	2017	Kelsey Plum	0-1, Score/Allow: 57-64, Rating: -2.3
				Colorado St. 5 point favorite
25	Texas A&M	2011	Danielle Adams	0-1, Score/Allow: 69-76, Rating: 2.8
40	Louisville	2009	Angel McCoughtry	1-0, Score/Allow: 74-68, Rating: -1.7
				Texas A&M 5 point favorite
26	Maryland	2006	Crystal Langhorne	1-0, Score/Allow: 78-72, Rating: 2.3
39	Kentucky	2013	A'dia Mathies	1-0, Score/Allow: 72-63, Rating: -0.8
				Maryland 3 point favorite
27	Vanderbilt	2002	Chantelle Anderson	1-0, Score/Allow: 76-65, Rating: 2.2
38	Duke	2006	Monique Currie	0-1, Score/Allow: 66-75, Rating: -0.3
				Vanderbilt 3 point favorite
28	Notre Dame	2001	Ruth Riley	1-0, Score/Allow: 80-76, Rating: 2
37	UCLA	2018	Jordin Canada	1-0, Score/Allow: 71-63, Rating: -0.3
				Notre Dame 2 point favorite
29	Virginia	1991	Tonya Cardoza	1-0, Score/Allow: 76-72, Rating: 1.3
36	South Carolina	2017	A'ja Wilson	1-1, Score/Allow: 69-73.5, Rating: 0
				Virginia 1 point favorite
30	Mississippi State	2018	Victoria Vivians	0-1, Score/Allow: 58-74, Rating: 1.3
35	Old Dominion	1980	Inge Nissen	0-1, Score/Allow: 55-80, Rating: 0.5
				Mississippi State 1 point favorite
31	Marquette	2019	Natisha Hiedeman	1-0, Score/Allow: 68-64, Rating: 1
34	Ohio State	1993	Katie Smith	0-1, Score/Allow: 65-76, Rating: 1
				Marquette 0 point favorite
32	Indiana	2024	Mackenzie Holmes	1-0, Score/Allow: 78-70, Rating: 1
33	Old Dominion	1985	Medina Dixon	0-1, Score/Allow: 68-74, Rating: 1
				Indiana 0 point favorite

Misiorowski and Coors Field Recalculations post Statis-Pro Season

While we will soon be moving to Value Add Basketball to get the great women’s teams on the court, we did catch a couple of things in our postmortem on the Statis-Pro baseball season.

More Accurate Pitcher Cards

We finally have truly accurate ranges for determining the results on pitchers’ cards. Batters’ cards are easy: Hits = (H/PA × 128) − 11; 2B = 2B/PA × 128; 3B = 3B/PA × 128; HR = HR/PA × 128; then three deep numbers; K = (K/PA × 128) − 17; BB = (BB)/PA × 128 - 7; HPB = (hpb)/PA × 128 and the rest are outs.

We noted during the season that one reason the Brewers were not as good in the game as they were in the actual season was that Jacob Misiorowski was very good but also walked a lot of batters. The card shown is what his card would have looked like based solely on this season’s statistics.

We have now built extremely accurate tables to calculate how many hits, strikeouts and walks should appear on every pitcher’s card.

You still first need to calculate the pitcher’s PB — 2-9, 2-8, etc. — and then divide his hits, strikeouts and walks by his total batters faced and look up each percentage on the appropriate chart.

For example, Misiorowski is a PB 2-9. The MLB average for hits allowed is about 22%, while Misiorowski allowed hits to only 14% of the batters he faced. That gives him just 8 hits on his card, from 11-18.

The average strikeout rate is about 22%, which would put 16 strikeouts on a PB 2-9 card, while Misiorowski struck out an incredible 38% of the batters he faced. That gives him 27 strikeouts on his card.

Finally, the average walk rate is about 9%, which would produce 6 walks on the card, while Misiorowski walked only about 6% of the batters he faced. That gives him just 4 walks on the card.

Once those three numbers are determined for any pitcher, every remaining result among the 64 possible 11-88 readings is an out.

Playing Every Team Helps Us Catch the Glitches

One reason we play every team every year in Statis-Pro is to see if we catch any glitches.

For example, we threw in a game with the 29th-place Rockies hosting the 30th-place Los Angeles Angels because neither team had played during our pods.

What immediately jumped out was the Rockies’ home field. The average DEEP drive was going out for a home run at the same rate as it would in an average ballpark, so Coors Field really wasn’t playing like the extreme hitters’ park that it actually is.

In an average park, a DEEP result is a home run on 11-35, while 36-88 results in a deep fly with runners advancing. But we realized that simply adjusting the home-run range doesn't fully account for ballpark differences. Some parks also produce significantly more singles, doubles or triples.

We have now updated the ballpark charts to build those additional factors into the game.

When you look at the chart below, you will see that Colorado is now the ultimate hitters’ park: every DEEP reading on a card results in a hit of some kind, with the runners always advancing one base farther than the batter.

And here are the charts for calculating pitchers' cards moving forward.

 

Percent	H/BF	BK	K/BF	W/BF
PB 2-9	PB 2-9		PB 2-9	PB 2-9
0%	No hits	11	0	0
1%	No hits	11	0	0
2%	No hits	11	0	1
3%	No hits	11	0	2
4%	No hits	11	1	2
5%	No hits	11	2	3
6%	11'-11	12	2	4
7%	11'-12	13	3	5
8%	11'-13	14	4	5
9%	11'-14	15	5	6
10%	11'-14	15	5	7
11%	11'-15	16	6	8
12%	11'-16	17	7	8
13%	11'-17	18	8	9
14%	11'-18	21	9	10
15%	11'-18	21	10	11
16%	11'-21	22	10	11
17%	11'-22	23	11	12
17%	11'-22	23	12	13
18%	11'-23	24	13	13
19%	11'-24	25	13	13
20%	11'-25	26	14	14
21%	11'-25	26	15	15
22%	11'-26	27	16	15
23%	11'-27	27	16	15
24%	11'-28	31	17	16
25%	11'-31	32	18	16
26%	11'-31	32	19	16
27%	11'-32	33	19	16
28%	11'-33	34	20	16
29%	11'-34	35	21	16
30%	11'-34	35	22	16
31%	11'-34	35	22	16
32%	11'-34	35	23	16
33%	11'-34	35	24	16
34%	11'-34	35	25	16
35%	11'-34	35	25	16
36%	11'-34	35	26	16
37%	11'-34	35	26	16
38%	11'-34	35	27	16
39%	11'-34	35	28	16
40%	11'-34	35	28	16
Percent	H/BF	BK	K/BF	W/BF
PB 2-8	PB 2-8	PB 2-8	PB 2-8	PB 2-8
0%	No hits	11	0	0
1%	No hits	11	0	0
2%	No hits	11	0	0
3%	No hits	11	0	1
4%	No hits	11	0	2
5%	No hits	11	1	3
6%	No hits	11	1	4
7%	11'-11	12	2	5
8%	11'-12	13	3	6
9%	11'-13	14	4	6
10%	11'-13	14	5	7
11%	11'-14	15	6	8
12%	11'-15	16	6	9
13%	11'-16	17	7	10
14%	11'-17	18	8	11
15%	11'-17	18	9	12
16%	11'-18	21	10	12
17%	11'-21	22	11	13
18%	11'-22	23	13	14
19%	11'-23	24	13	14
20%	11'-24	25	14	15
21%	11'-25	26	15	16
22%	11'-26	27	16	16
23%	11'-27	28	17	16
24%	11'-28	31	18	16
25%	11'-31	32	19	16
26%	11'-31	32	20	16
27%	11'-32	33	21	16
28%	11'-33	34	22	16
29%	11'-34	35	23	16
30%	11'-34	35	24	16
31%	11'-34	35	25	16
32%	11'-34	35	26	16
33%	11'-34	35	27	16
34%	11'-34	35	28	16
35%	11'-34	35	28	16
36%	11'-34	35	28	16
37%	11'-34	35	28	16
38%	11'-34	35	28	16
39%	11'-34	35	28	16
40%	11'-34	35	28	16
Percent	H/BF	BK	K/BF	W/BF
PB 2-7	PB 2-7	PB 2-7	PB 2-7	PB 2-7
0%	No hits	11	0	0
1%	No hits	11	0	0
2%	No hits	11	0	0
3%	No hits	11	0	0
4%	No hits	11	0	2
5%	No hits	11	0	3
6%	No hits	11	0	4
7%	No hits	11	1	5
8%	11'-11	12	1	6
9%	11'-12	13	2	7
10%	11'-12	13	3	8
11%	11'-13	14	4	9
12%	11'-14	15	5	10
13%	11'-15	16	6	11
14%	11'-16	17	8	13
15%	11'-16	17	9	14
16%	11'-17	18	10	14
17%	11'-18	21	11	15
18%	11'-21	22	13	16
19%	11'-22	23	14	16
20%	11'-23	24	15	16
21%	11'-24	25	16	16
22%	11'-25	26	17	16
23%	11'-26	27	18	16
24%	11'-27	28	19	16
25%	11'-28	31	21	16
26%	11'-31	32	22	16
27%	11'-33	34	23	16
28%	11'-34	35	24	16
29%	11'-34	35	25	16
30%	11'-34	35	26	16
31%	11'-34	35	27	16
32%	11'-34	35	28	16
33%	11'-34	35	28	16
34%	11'-34	35	28	16
35%	11'-34	35	28	16
36%	11'-34	35	28	16
37%	11'-34	35	28	16
38%	11'-34	35	28	16
39%	11'-34	35	28	16
40%	11'-34	35	28	16
Percent	H/BF	BK	K/BF	W/BF
PB 4-7	PB 4-7	PB 4-7	PB 4-7	PB 4-7
0%	No hits	11	0	0
1%	No hits	11	0	0
2%	No hits	11	0	0
3%	No hits	11	0	0
4%	No hits	11	0	1
5%	No hits	11	0	2
6%	No hits	11	0	4
7%	No hits	11	0	5
8%	No hits	11	0	6
9%	11'-11	12	1	8
10%	11'-11	12	2	9
11%	11'-12	13	3	10
12%	11'-13	14	4	11
13%	11'-14	15	5	13
14%	11'-15	16	7	14
15%	11'-15	16	8	15
16%	11'-16	17	9	15
17%	11'-17	18	10	16
18%	11'-18	21	13	16
19%	11'-21	22	15	16
20%	11'-22	23	16	16
21%	11'-23	24	17	16
22%	11'-24	25	18	16
23%	11'-26	27	20	16
24%	11'-27	28	21	16
25%	11'-28	31	22	16
26%	11'-32	33	23	16
27%	11'-33	34	24	16
28%	11'-34	35	25	16
29%	11'-34	35	26	16
30%	11'-34	35	27	16
31%	11'-34	35	28	16
32%	11'-34	35	28	16
33%	11'-34	35	28	16
34%	11'-34	35	28	16
35%	11'-34	35	28	16
36%	11'-34	35	28	16
37%	11'-34	35	28	16
38%	11'-34	35	28	16
39%	11'-34	35	28	16
40%	11'-34	35	28	16